01-21-2011, 02:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2011, 02:12 PM by rva_jeremy.)
(01-21-2011, 01:51 PM)unity100 Wrote: this is a matter of spirit. you should have taken it head on, and taken the channeled message itself, purely, before anything else.
I'd appreciate it if you could expand on your reasoning here. It might help understand your perspective better. Your position here is just about as opposite to mine as I could imagine!
(01-21-2011, 01:51 PM)unity100 Wrote: that would not be a wise course of action. what is space opera to one, may be something that would unlock something in another's subconscious, even without the person being aware of it.
I couldn't agree more. Which is why this would not be a rewriting of the material itself; the original sessions would obviously be the important core material to investigate. Ideally I'm thinking of something to be to the sessions what the Talmud is to the Torah.
In any case, don't construe any of this to mean that I don't appreciate your perspective, Unity. I see where you're coming from and in many ways agree with what you're saying.
(01-21-2011, 01:56 PM)peregrine Wrote: I dunno, dude, you might wanna try going the other way. The world may be ready now for the first Space Opera! I'd buy a ticket.
I might suggest a Wagnerian approach.
Glad you're open to any response, by the way.
Absolutely! You might be right about it being the other way around - one could see a lot of David Wilcock's work as upping the ante on the exo-political aspect of all this.
I don't bring any of this up lightly; it's something I've thought about for a long, long time. If anything, my rereading of the material has made me less convinced of the thesis I'm arguing, not more. But I also recognize how deeply used to the attitude and concepts of the material I am, and that newbies don't have this.
What would really help me is your explanations for *why* you would not choose this path I've explained. The reason is that I've discussed this with myself a lot, but I haven't exposed this approach to much scrutiny from otherselves. It's sort of a final test of the idea to bring it up at all.
I got a 1:11 when considering your points of view, you guys should know. I'm increasingly of the opinion that the value of this would not outweigh the disservice it would do. Thanks for letting me test drive the idea with y'all!