02-06-2020, 05:06 PM
(02-06-2020, 04:19 PM)Infinite Wrote: It seems to me the term "Harvest" come from biblical perspectives:Here is one from Matthew
Quote:6 The person who is taught God’s word should share all good things with his teacher. 7 Make no mistake about this: You can never make a fool out of God. Whatever you plant is what you’ll harvest. 8 If you plant in the soil of your corrupt nature, you will harvest destruction. But if you plant in the soil of your spiritual nature, you will harvest everlasting life.(Galatians 6:6-8)
It makes sense to me.
Quote:Matthew 13:30. Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.
Tares grew with the wheat and looked identical to wheat until it matured and only until then could you tell the wheat from the tares. They grow side by side and only until their maturity (growth) could you then tell them apart and upon which time the wheat would bow in reverence and humility as if it were doing the Will of God (hence the parable), tares upon maturity doesn't bow (hence the parable) in other words it lacks in reverence or humility. And that is the parable of the wheat and tares.
Let's not get caught up in a word. Its just a parable.
The word "burn: that is used just means to forever separate the two.
Just as the word "barn" is not a literal barn, it is the kingdom of Heaven.
I guess that is why I thought that harvest was a positive thing.
Also, I would like to say once more that I consider one who speaks about love as much as Ra would almost have to be a positive entity.
Actually, in all, the material is very light upon speaking negatively about anything at all.
Unless I am missing something...