01-06-2020, 03:42 AM
Welcome to the forum, Angela. 
I agree with Diana's thoughts on the notion of not being attached to an outcome.
Overall, I think we must separate how entities that come from elsewhere work under the notion of free will, such as those entities of the Confederation, and how we members of humanity do it when we interact with each other. I think these are two very different situations. The Confederation has to be extra careful around the notion of free will because they cannot offer undeniable proof to humanity that such and such beliefs that we hold are true, proof that aliens exist, or proof that there is even life after death. This is different for us. We have more freedom in what we can do with other humans or what ideas we can share with them, simply because none of us has undeniable proof that any such things are true. We can talk about life after death to someone, for example, and it will always be their decision what to believe in, no matter what we say. So, we don't have to be as careful with free will as the Confederation. I couldn't say how careful exactly we need to be. Being so concerned with free will has the danger of not putting up on display those valuable things that you have to offer. How is someone going to ask you to share your gifts, if they don't even know about them? But then there's the opposite problem, which you're well aware of, of possibly imposing the self upon others. I think every situation is different, and that it's up to us to decide every time where to draw that line. Always looking at one's own intentions, and without being attached to an outcome, like Diana said.
In the particular case that you mentioned of sending love and light, I think that's perfectly alright each and every single time. I see this love that we send as a resource that we are making available to the other entity. It's up to them whether to make use of it or not.
If you think about it, sending love even to an STS entity that is repelled by it is not a violation of free will. This is because the only other options with STS entities are:
1) To ignore them, which is unlikely to work, because they do not respect free will and they will find any means they can to get your attention if this is what they want.
2) To battle their negativity with more negativity; obviously not an option for us.
3) To wish they get what they desire, which is enslavement of other entities. As such, we respect the STS entity's free will, but we infringe upon the free will of other entities who don't wish to be enslaved.
Sending love and light, then, is the only remaining option. We're not imposing anything on the STS entity. We offer it another possibility. We teach it that it can be loved, even when it itself is not being loving. They have the option of either accepting this love onto themselves, or going away back into the darkness.
I agree with Diana's thoughts on the notion of not being attached to an outcome.
Overall, I think we must separate how entities that come from elsewhere work under the notion of free will, such as those entities of the Confederation, and how we members of humanity do it when we interact with each other. I think these are two very different situations. The Confederation has to be extra careful around the notion of free will because they cannot offer undeniable proof to humanity that such and such beliefs that we hold are true, proof that aliens exist, or proof that there is even life after death. This is different for us. We have more freedom in what we can do with other humans or what ideas we can share with them, simply because none of us has undeniable proof that any such things are true. We can talk about life after death to someone, for example, and it will always be their decision what to believe in, no matter what we say. So, we don't have to be as careful with free will as the Confederation. I couldn't say how careful exactly we need to be. Being so concerned with free will has the danger of not putting up on display those valuable things that you have to offer. How is someone going to ask you to share your gifts, if they don't even know about them? But then there's the opposite problem, which you're well aware of, of possibly imposing the self upon others. I think every situation is different, and that it's up to us to decide every time where to draw that line. Always looking at one's own intentions, and without being attached to an outcome, like Diana said.
In the particular case that you mentioned of sending love and light, I think that's perfectly alright each and every single time. I see this love that we send as a resource that we are making available to the other entity. It's up to them whether to make use of it or not.
If you think about it, sending love even to an STS entity that is repelled by it is not a violation of free will. This is because the only other options with STS entities are:
1) To ignore them, which is unlikely to work, because they do not respect free will and they will find any means they can to get your attention if this is what they want.
2) To battle their negativity with more negativity; obviously not an option for us.
3) To wish they get what they desire, which is enslavement of other entities. As such, we respect the STS entity's free will, but we infringe upon the free will of other entities who don't wish to be enslaved.
Sending love and light, then, is the only remaining option. We're not imposing anything on the STS entity. We offer it another possibility. We teach it that it can be loved, even when it itself is not being loving. They have the option of either accepting this love onto themselves, or going away back into the darkness.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)