(11-17-2019, 10:19 PM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote: I doubt Bush is a 6D negative wander. I'm gonna need some serious evidence for that claim, cause that's a big one. 6D negatives are RARE. Bush was dumb. Not sure how his life would be useful to a 6D negative who would be learning really ADVANCED lessons in service to self development. Bush doesn't seem that advanced. But who knows?
Sorry...I'm not claiming it to be true.
I'm just providing a hypothetical situation, where being service to self would be almost guaranteed.
Incarnating as a Rockefeller or Rothschild...would be a pretty sure way to be at the top of the pile IMO
If 1% rule the rest...it would make sense that they are the negative wanderers...I'd say 1% is pretty uncommon.