(01-14-2011, 08:09 PM)unity100 Wrote:(01-14-2011, 07:37 PM)JoshC Wrote: I dunno who that is, but yes anyone on both sides of the spectrum. Jesus and Hitler were neither too "this" nor not enough "that," in my opinion.
http://lawofone.info/results.php?search_...&ss=1&sc=1
correction : aleister crowley
Oh that's a perfect example for the thread! Nice one
Yes I think even he wasn't too spiritual... The idea of the existence of "too" something means that there are things and/or choices that are better or worse than other things and/or choices. Only in the reality which allows for polarity, that is, right and wrong, left and right, better and worse, hot and cold, is such a thing possible. Coming from the realm which shows "this" and "that," that is, the realm that provides for contrast, it's certainly possible to say that someone is too spiritual, but such a labeling is only one's labeling and interpretation of reality.My answer deals with and comes from the realm of absolutes - that is, there is not hot or cold, there is no right or wrong, there is no left or right, there is no better or worse. The approach I take here is how I approach most of life
(01-14-2011, 08:21 PM)Phoenix Wrote: I dunno. Even though this has neglectfully become the running commentary in this place there is no proof of what 'the people who currently control this planet' wanted or how they set out to achieve their aims, or that they really control what you are suggesting they control.
Agreed - and even that there are people who attempt to control this planet.