(10-12-2019, 10:32 AM)Loki Wrote: 1) Was ever a time after creation started when higher self did not exist yet?
This may be difficult to understand due to the nature of space/time. Within Creation, there is posited a progression from "density" to "density" which is forward in motion (from Infinity to 1D to 7D to Infinity). Without space/time there is no appreciable or measurable means of experience (change, growth). The "higher self," or perhaps more appropriately "oversoul" (as the concept of "self" may be a bit too personal/anthropomorphic and lead to ego mis-identification), is, linearly-speaking, properly a "condition" of a 6D entity/ies.
It might be worth considering the relationships between 1D and 7D, 2D and 6D; with these concepts in mind: sunrise, sunset; entry, exit; birth, death; forming, dissolving; looking forward, looking backward; opening the eye/I, closing the eye/I.
Quote:2) Do second density complexes have higher selves?
Yes, in the same way "higher selves" have 2D "lower selves" (which is of course not a "self" in the sense of an individuated/separately self-aware 3D/4D/5D ego/personality). Here's a little experiment: (dis)place your consciousness into that of cellular awareness and see what 2D organs/organisms truly "look/feel/are" like
Quote:3) Are there multiple space/time time/spaces lines of the third density of the same mind/body/spirit complex which are all supervised by same higher self. is it possible for two of those line to be existing at the same time on the same planet. (I mean the same higher self having two or more mind/body/spirit complexes in the same time on earth and two complexes if they ever meet they will believe they are two different people. is it possible now on earth to exist some 2D entity which is a version of my complex?
Yes, yes, and yes.
Quote:4) The time/space space/time seems to be independent for each densities, when a Wanderer dies is he going to the time/space of the density he serves in or in the time/space of the density he is from?
Depends on many variables. Perhaps the simplest answer would be: that particular ego/personality will find itself where it needs to be to carry on whatever story will lead it to realize itself as the Creator beyond, yet within, its own Creation.
There is only the Creator, after all
Quote:5) after a new incarnation happens does the higher self evolves based on the experiences the mind/body/spirit complex?
This likely not fully understandable by a 3D/4D/5D entity due to the nature of time/space. Perhaps the simplest answer would be: the "higher self" is already evolved up to that point. It's merely looking "backwards" (which appears to be coming from the "future" for the 3D/4D/5D entity).
Again, might be worth considering the relative position of the "oversoul" in the grand scheme of things here: 6D is more or less (re)collecting, integrating, summing up, unifying its beingness before moving to 7D (no memory, no past, no future, no history, no identity) in preparation for dissolution into Infinity. "The looking backwards is finished at that point."
'Twas all a Dream
Quote:6) After previous incarnation is reviewed in time/space is the new incarnation happening in the same time line or each incarnation has an independent time line and the entity can actually have a second incarnation starting in the same chronological year with the previous one?
Difficult to adequately answer from the vantage point of time/space. This is further muddled by the fact multiple parallel incarnations may/have/will be/been occurring simultaneously.
Quote:7) Is there an entity in creation which does not have a higher self?
This is like saying: is there a color in the rainbow that does not have an indigo spectrum? The simplest answer is: nope. All entities within illusion exist/will/have existed across all "densities." However, this cannot properly be understood from a 3D point of view (which on top of everything, is further limited by having a "metaphysical veil" placed in mind).
Either way: all there is One Infinite Creator. The rest, though beautifully fascinating, is "the devil in the details"