01-14-2011, 12:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-14-2011, 01:01 AM by Nabil Naser.)
As I see it, you are rejecting the idea that ET's do not wish humanity harm. I sense that you believe that STS entities have made strong roots within the planet.
I happen to disagree, as I believe that most ET out there have nothing but good will for humanity. I agree that if ET's wanted to kill us they can do that at any time.
If we go back to what we learned from Ra, we find that we have been protected from harm by the quarantine that was imposed on the planet.
Universal free will laws allow the federation to protect the planet, without infringing on individual free will.
I strongly disagree with the paranoid reactions of many people to what is taking place at the present. I remind everyone that it is our thoughts and desires that make the difference on what tomorrow will be like.
I happen to disagree, as I believe that most ET out there have nothing but good will for humanity. I agree that if ET's wanted to kill us they can do that at any time.
If we go back to what we learned from Ra, we find that we have been protected from harm by the quarantine that was imposed on the planet.
Universal free will laws allow the federation to protect the planet, without infringing on individual free will.
I strongly disagree with the paranoid reactions of many people to what is taking place at the present. I remind everyone that it is our thoughts and desires that make the difference on what tomorrow will be like.
(01-13-2011, 11:54 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Here's an example of an interpretive framework: Dr. Greer (a leader and prominent individual behind the "Disclosure" movement) is mentioned in that article. Greer, and other consequentialists, unfortunately can not or will not consider the broader implications of their own subject matter. I have seen how they will promote ideas they think will increase popular support or governmental pressure, often without regard to the means employed to motivate it. For example, first officially rejecting certain 'government insider' information as disinfo - then promoting it themselves. Not because the info was true, but because it was (like a lot of ET/UFO rumors) ultimately not disprovable, became popular with influential figures, and served to promote their agenda.
Literally and on record, to Greer, there are no 'negative' ETs visiting earth. This is due to the rationale (and popular 1950's notion) if they were indeed 'hostile' the earth population would be destroyed or enslaved by now. Consider maintaining such at mindset, and still be a contactee (to a supposedly greater reality). For better or worse, there are certain ideas that people promote that lead me to reject, ad hominem, much of their agenda as a whole.