01-09-2011, 07:30 PM
Sure, it's difficult to justify propagating conspiracy theories without getting sidetracked with one's identification with an ethical mission. But that's in keeping with the illusion of 3rd density. We choose what we want to see and condemn the innocent in the process.
How many conspiracy theorists contribute to actual progress in the areas which they think information suppression occurs? They typically do nothing themselves to advance real scientific or investigative knowledge the areas they demand be 'revealed' - such as free energy inventions or E.T. contact, for example. Ultimately, how can there be real merit or virtue when the completely unnecessary charge of disservice can be false? After all, suspicion like that breeds mistrust which necessarily promotes a distorted view of society offered to everyone. Opportunistic framing of perceived 'lacunae', for the purpose of social change, is the consequentialist's agenda.
How many conspiracy theorists contribute to actual progress in the areas which they think information suppression occurs? They typically do nothing themselves to advance real scientific or investigative knowledge the areas they demand be 'revealed' - such as free energy inventions or E.T. contact, for example. Ultimately, how can there be real merit or virtue when the completely unnecessary charge of disservice can be false? After all, suspicion like that breeds mistrust which necessarily promotes a distorted view of society offered to everyone. Opportunistic framing of perceived 'lacunae', for the purpose of social change, is the consequentialist's agenda.