An analysis of the STS mindset and path

[Sacred Fool]

I'm not quite sure what or why R & U are arguing about bias.  I just want to interject that, for a returning wanderer, there is a concern for balancing, accepting and eliminating bias.  This is work--which a 6D entity may offer to the Creator--which is potentially accelerated by wandering in 3D.

I find this to be true in regards to taming wisdom by embracing love more fully, as 3d revolves around the lessons of love. But I'm not sure it applies to other kinds of balancing. Finding complete and absolute balance in every area seems like high density work that is beyond what we can aspire to, here in 3d. You said accepting the bias, which I agree with, but the "eliminating" bit sounds like the kind of "overcoming the ego" that Ra warned against (18.5):

https://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=18#5

And as the self acknowledges, accepts and admires with great affection the self, the Creator harvests all of that complexity and strains it into self-awareness that is without bias*.

Isn't that referring to the Creator Him/Her/Itself being the one without bias?

18.5 ▶ Questioner: Thank you. I have a question here from Jim that I will read verbatim: “Much of the mystic tradition of seeking on Earth holds that belief that the individual self must be erased or obliterated and the material world ignored for an entity to reach ‘nirvana,’ as it’s called, or enlightenment. What is the proper role of the individual self and its worldly activities in aiding an entity to grow more into the Law of One?”

Ra: I am Ra. The proper role of the entity is in this density to experience all things desired, to then analyze, understand, and accept these experiences, distilling from them the love/light within them. Nothing shall be overcome. That which is not needed falls away.

The orientation develops due to analysis of desire. These desires become more and more distorted towards conscious application of love/light as the entity furnishes itself with distilled experience. We have found it to be inappropriate in the extreme to encourage the overcoming of any desires, except to suggest the imagination rather than the carrying out in the physical plane, as you call it, of those desires not consonant with the Law of One; this preserving the primal distortion of free will.

The reason it is unwise to overcome is that overcoming is an unbalanced action creating difficulties in balancing in the time/space continuum. Overcoming thus creates the further environment for holding onto that which apparently has been overcome.

All things are acceptable in the proper time for each entity, and in experiencing, in understanding, in accepting, in then sharing with other-selves, the appropriate description shall be moving away from distortions of one kind to distortions of another which may be more consonant with the Law of One.

It is, shall we say, a shortcut to simply ignore or overcome any desire. It must instead be understood and accepted. This takes patience and experience which can be analyzed with care, with compassion for self and for other-self.

One can read 18.5 to emphasize the not-overcoming message; alternatively, one can read the emboldened portion above to clinch the argument that it is self as Creator which distills from one's experience love and light (which one might suppose are ultimately unbiased).  Yes, this is probably not going to bear fruit 100% in any given 3D lifetime, rather, it's a progressive process of becoming more naked to eternity.  Or not, I suppose.

I realize that you were really looking at the linear progression up through the densities and how the STS option might work into that, and that I'm tossing in a more complex idea regarding the relationship between the 3D learning classroom and 6D balancing of consciousness leading to timelessness.  I hope you don't mind my thickening the plot.  I just find this element of more compelling interest.