No entity without help 50:5

[kristina]

Ra also said in 20.26, that sometimes there is no need for any Confederation aid during a master cycle of 75.000 years

Step out of Earth for a moment and see the Big Picture: there are millions of planets across Creation undergoing evolution starting with 1D. Most of these planets' evolution through 3D to 4D is more or less relatively harmonious and without any great complications: A 2D candidate graduates to 3D and then proceeds to 4D relatively unimpeded with little to no external (hi-D) aid needed. This is the norm. And that's your typical 3D scenario, veiled and all.

Earth, on the other hand, is the exception to the rule. This is for a couple reasons:

• 2D-to-3D evolution was "interrupted" as several other 3D races were "genetically transplanted" here (notably Martians and Denebians, and a few other minor/secondary ones "inserted" at various points thru human history—it's not like everyone was "dumped together" all at once).
  

• Almost all of these "transplants" were 3D grade repeaters (they "failed" to graduate 3D at least once, so when their former planet shifted to 4D—if they didn't render it inhospitable first—they were relocated here). In other words, they are the "problem child" in school. And this, in a sense, is a type of retardation (don't misread, please: to "retard" means "slow down" or "delay" in terms of progress/development).
  

• Add to that: this mish-mash of radically different races with radically different planetary minds/backgrounds inevitably leads to some degree of cultural/religious clash (often resulting in war and bloodshed), which in turn contributes to an exacerbated sense of separation and therefore difficulty/inability to collectively come together as one people.
  

And there you have a recipe for great tribulation. All of this is generally overlooked, but it's extremely important to understand, because you aren't dealing with one single 3D civilization here, but multiple mismatching 3D races on one 3D planet.

How is that we could become separated from unity (50:5)?

There is no "we" in Unity/Infinity. "We" is the illusion of One being many. "We" is the separation. And "we" is the means whereby One realizes itself.

1.7 That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept. To have infinity you must identify or define that infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning.

Are we not within the illusion? Yes, you are me and I am you...
Are you/I not individuated at this point? 3rd density? Space/time?
This first part of the OP was Jim McCarty speaking regarding the Confedration, not myself. This quote was taken from the Camelot Journals. My questions regarding the post in the Camelot Journals are at the bottom of the quote.
What I am asking is underlined and in bold print.
Thank you for your reply.