06-03-2019, 10:25 AM
(06-02-2019, 07:25 AM)kristina Wrote:Why would it indicate that?(05-31-2019, 11:14 AM)Cainite Wrote:Curious....If an entity wouldn't directly experience the suffering it has caused as you put it (and I like that), wouldn't that possibly indicate it would be leaning more toward positive polarization but like Nau7ik said, in a tanlge of fear or perhaps guilt?(05-31-2019, 10:07 AM)kristina Wrote:(05-31-2019, 08:15 AM)Dtris Wrote: I have seen the explanation of Hell of being the separation from the Creator, I have also seen the explanation that it is self created after death for a time due to the belief that it is what is expected.
Hell is a religious concept that IMO most likely stems from STS interference when the holy books were channeled. The use of the concept of hell is in controlling the believers. It is to impress upon people that a power greater than their own can control their eternal life, and say what is acceptable and what is not.
Suffering in itself is not hell, since suffering can also be full of love. If you and another are starving, and you give the last of your food to someone else, you will suffer from hunger, but also be full of love.
IMO, suffering can be a hell as it is subjective
I also think that after death the entity reviews the lived incarnation, and won't directly experience the suffering it has caused. there will probably just be the realization that the harm had been brought to the self.
If the entity is already polarized negatively to some extent, it won't even be bothered with that I suppose.. and will plan one or more incarnations in which he would hope to make it to 4D negative.
I've often said if you want to snuff the human spirit of life out let them know guilt and regret.
I'm not sure if I understand the question.