Crawling in the dark with a candle

[zenmaster]

Once you have practiced something by living it and experiencing it then it becomes part of your energy imprint and becomes you. Then it is yours... All the theories are good and helpful for understanding but if we can not walk the talk it is not doing us any good...

You got it. What you are describing is a principle of nature - a template for evolution from the logos. That's why the experience of mind archetype is depicted or epitomized by the authority or effectual figure.

The function of intuition is to inform intelligence. However, 1) intuition alone does not create experience - it merely perceives information with zero integration into one's experience (owning it) without evaluation and 2) your ability to intuit depends on prior experience, like a feedback loop spiraling upwards.

"The function of intuition is to inform intelligence. In your illusion the unbridled predominance of intuition will tend to keep an entity from the greater polarizations due to the vagaries of intuitive perception."

Polarization is an individuation process. It's becoming your own accepted source of information, rather than the yellow-ray, status-quo group-mind of 3D. It's moving up the subdensities - which entails creating an experiential bias through rational evaluation (choosing). "Rational" here purely in the Jungian sense of a judgment (not necessarily intellect-based) being made. The evaluation is either feeling (yin) based or thinking (yang) based. And of course some mixture of both.

"As you may see, these two types of brain structure need to be balanced in order that the net sum of experiential catalyst will be polarization and illumination, for without the acceptance by the rational mind of the worth of the intuitive faculty the creative aspects which aid in illumination will be stifled."

So you don't have to be logical to polarize, but you must eventually decide what you like and what you don't like, for example. Or as Ra said learn the mind, then learn the body. The particular biases that they offer are your program of study. It really doesn't matter what you choose to think or feel, specifically - because you are your own guide. You have an instruction manual in the form of what you feel during honesty.

When 3D yellow-ray wanes, those without work accomplished in determining their own natures, will be 'caught with their pants down'. Because there will be little of that group mind (sustained by yellow ray) to fall back on. They will literally begin feeling more and more 'lost' and maybe 'alone'.

---

I'm not sure I follow. What do you mean by "need"?

What I mean is that it seems to me there are certain things that you can never fully learn by hearing about it from someone else, reading about it, or otherwise having it explained. The measure twice cut once rule that woodworkers swear by is a good example of this. You are told, always measure twice, so that you only have to cut the wood once. Great advice right? But how many new wood workers always, from the very start to the very end of their careers, measure twice? They learn by messing up, and then they "know" the measure twice. That's a rough example that could be argued down, but I think you get my meaning. But it seems that there are other things that aren't like that, such as mathematics. You can learn it mentally without having to physically do anything. All you need to do is think, which is a time/space thing. Thus it's something that I think you don't need to be alive in a physical vehicle on a planet to do. (although the application of it is very beneficial of course).

What do you believe "love" truly is?

What a huge question In this particular case though, as regards densities, I am meaning the polarizing love that we may find for other selves or for our-selves. We could gather that that fundamental STO vs. STS choice, the choice of how to love that third density is for is a priority for us at this time on Earth. More so I would wager, than intellectual thought development.

There is a basic misunderstanding here. Intellectual thought is not an "end". It is a means to evaluate what is "true to oneself". Also, it's not an either-or thing with learning how to love, as you seem to emphasize. In fact, you can't learn anything at all, without evaluating using either left or right side of brain - the so-called "heart" or "head".