Wanderers during Harvest, according to Hidden Hand

[anagogy]

Now, an off-topic question: what you think about Cassiopeia material? I started read the first volume but I dropped. Much bullshit about conspiracies and we know that apocalyptica messages are STS tactics to detune STO channels.

I have read a great deal of the Cassiopaea contact. I even own some books by Laura Knight-Jadczyk, and overall, I think it is a mixed contact. Some is positive, some is negative.

As Ra said:

---

"It is quite precisely correct that the level and purity of this contact is dependent upon the level and purity of information sought. Thusly, the continued requests for specific information from this particular source is deleterious to the substance of your purpose."

---

And:

---

"We can only ask each group to consider the relative effect of philosophy and your so-called specific information. It is not the specificity of the information which attracts negative influences. It is the importance placed upon it.

This is why we iterate quite often, when asked for specific information, that it pales to insignificance, just as the grass withers and dies while the love and the light of the One Infinite Creator redounds to the very infinite realms of creation forever and ever, creating and creating itself in perpetuity.

Why then be concerned with the grass that blooms, withers and dies in its season only to grow once again due to the infinite love and light of the One Creator? This is the message we bring. Each entity is only superficially that which blooms and dies. In the deeper sense there is no end to beingness."

---

And:

---

"It is entirely possible for the untuned channel, as you call that service, to receive both positive and negative communications. If the entity at the base of its confusion is oriented towards service to others, the entity will begin to receive messages of doom. If the entity at the base of the complex of beingness is oriented towards service to self, the crusaders, who in this case, do not find it necessary to lie, will simply begin to give the philosophy they are here to give. Many of your so-called contacts among your people have been confused and self-destructive because the channels were oriented towards service to others but, in the desire for proof, were open to the lying information of the crusaders who then were able to neutralize the effectiveness of the channel."

---

And Ouija is not trustworthy anyway.

I would say, don't necessarily blame the Ouija for bad information as it is just a tool for getting the conscious ego out of the way. I actually have an exact replica of the Ouija (or more accurately: the spirit board) used by the Cassiopaean contact (though I haven't channeled on it in long time). The spirit board is just a tool. Just like any conscious channeler, it is as accurate, or inaccurate, as the channeler is pure. Every being has access to the omniscience, or the infinite understanding, present within the creator, or all consciousness that has assumed identification within the illusion. But information channeled, or translated, through an untuned channel, whether it be a spirit board (which is merely just cardboard, plastic, or wood usually -- ignore the superstition), a human speaking words, or automatic writing, will only be translated clearly, and truly, to the exact same extent that the channel has been transformed by the purification process that represents the spiritual and archetypal alchemical process that is the human incarnational experience.

The tools are the tools. I would say, don't blame the tools for the humans using them badly.

Is the preponderance of information derived from Ouija (and spirit boards) boards negative? Yes.

But the reason is because most people who use these are either seeking trivial information, are scared to begin with (ooooh spooky Ouija board!), or deliberately seeking negative forces. The Cassiopaean contact focuses almost *exclusively* on conspiracies (specific information), and only occasionally seeks more pure and archetypal information, thus the purity of the information and contact is, unsurprisingly, detuned by the impure seeking of transient information.

I hope that answers your question.