Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers

[flofrog]

I continue to be shocked and amazed at how many in the spiritual community (not necessarily you in particular) appear to be numb to this, and have adopted such a blasé attitude about it, preferring to soothe (i.e. serve) themselves with little spiritual quips and taglines, and snuggling up underneath the covers with their sleeping friends,  instead of making a real effort to be of service to others. Or failing to act for fear of "losing their polarity."

To my view, those who just stand by and watch from the sidelines are the ones actually at greatest risk of polarity loss, since they are continually turning a blind eye toward opportunities to serve out of fear and self-concern.  To be sure, there is a place for those who wish to watch from the sidelines... but it is for them to remain on the other side of the veil, and out of incarnation.

RC, I wonder if this next small thing might be of interest... It doesn't really address the lack of help that should be given, mind you. I am like you, in often amazement as to how my life is in certain way safe, and though with sometimes difficult catalysts, totally privileged compared to what horrific things happen to others here or elsewhere on the globe. But to come back : nearly forty years ago I was studying Edgar Cayce and I remember on one medical reading he went onto reincarnation process and how it was forever, as long 'equanimity' of sort was not reached, how it was a balancing process, as he cited "as ye measure to others it will be measured to you' and there was a passage I remember from that time, but here not sure if it was from Cayce or from another reading, but I remember finding at that time a passage as some entities who had versed into racism right before WW2 reincarnating in South Africa as a balancing process. I mean I am sure karma is a much more subtle and complex process, and I think whenever help can be provided to ANY entity in distress it is mostly evident, but what I mean is, would perhaps the 'sleep' state not to be as evident as it may seem ? I don't know.

Not sure if I express this well... sorry !