Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers

[unity100]

To be fully honest and transparent here, I have to say that I can somewhat empathize with their attitude toward those neutral beings.  Though I can not see myself using the "domination unto physical death" as a means of promoting growth and evolution in other-selves, I have been known to use the very sharply pointed words as sort of a "zen slap" in order to shock a person momentarily into a higher state of awareness, in hopes that this may catalyze them into seeking.

Eh...

It would be best to avoid analogizing actual negative polarized sociopathy or sociopaths with minor 'offenses' like 'harsh language' or 'being too blunt'.

There arent parallels among those. Analogizing such wildly different things trivializes actual negativity, and blurs actual positivity.

Secondly- Ra says here that these two beings polarized negatively despite having created results contrary to their intentions. So which is it that holds sway in determining the polarization? Intentions or outcomes?

Dominating entities to physical death and exerting control over legions of people is negative polarization. There are no two ways to it. It cannot be 'i intended very good things but that just happened'. The complicated situations of these entities' spiritual development are their own, but in the end if you do negative acts, and accept the ensuing negative polarization, negative polarization happens...