Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers

[ada]

18.6 ▶ Questioner: Basically I would say that to infringe on the free will of another self or another entity would be the basic thing never to do under the Law of One. Can you state any other breaking of the Law of One than this basic rule?

Ra: I am Ra. As one proceeds from the primal distortion of free will, one proceeds to the understanding of the focal points of intelligent energy which have created the intelligences or the ways of a particular mind/body/spirit complex in its environment, both what you would call natural and what you would call man-made. Thus, the distortions to be avoided are those which do not take into consideration the distortions of the focus of energy of love/light, or shall we say, the Logos of this particular sphere or density. These include the lack of understanding of the needs of the natural environment, the needs of other-selves’ mind/body/spirit complexes. These are many due to the various distortions of man-made complexes in which the intelligence and awareness of entities themselves have chosen a way of using the energies available.

Thus, what would be an improper distortion with one entity is proper with another. We can suggest an attempt to become aware of the other-self as self and thus do that action which is needed by other-self, understanding from the other-self’s intelligence and awareness. In many cases this does not involve the breaking of the distortion of free will into a distortion or fragmentation called infringement. However, it is a delicate matter to be of service, and compassion, sensitivity, and an ability to empathize are helpful in avoiding the distortions of man-made intelligence and awareness.

Regarding the second question I don't really know. :-/

But I think your intention to learn from catalyst is what matters, even if you do slightly better it is worth your experience.

Thanks for sharing that quote.  Though the first paragraph does seem gibberish-y to me.  I've read it a few times and can't seem to make heads or tails of what they are trying to say there.  If it makes sense to you, I would appreciate if you could try to rephrase it for me in a way that might be more understandable.

As for the second paragraph, this does appear to clear things up for me some bit.   Indeed, I do always attempt to become "aware of the other-self as self" and do unto them as I would hope would be done unto me, were I in the same situation.  In the case of the example given here, if I were given to such a propensity for spiritually sleeping during this time of such great opportunity for growth, I would hope that some other-self would care about me enough to make every attempt to awaken me, even if it would possibly put their own polarity at risk.

I think the first paragraph regards the understanding of groups in relation to the needs and practice of free will of the individual other-self in their environment. (I'm also having difficulties in understanding)