Session 13 - "Grasping the needle" and polarization

[redchartreuse]

However, if we are talking about the polarization of a battery, then the term refers to the physical separation of ionic charges which causes the battery to be able to transmit electricity.

This analogy is the closest to the meaning used in Ra material.

Polarization of a given entity is not so different than such electrical polarization - as a device is more polarized in one direction, its potential difference, its magnetic field rises. Its similar on the planetary level. Its the same principle in polarized entities. The more polarized an entity is, the higher the push from its bottom pole towards upwards one, and the higher its energy flow goes in that direction.

The same principle immediately carries over to the society - as entities polarize in the same way, the resulting polarity of the society would be stronger. Which would carry over to the polarity and field strength of the planet.

Incidentally there is a social meaning too - as every entity polarizes in similar directions energetically, their behavior model and choices would cause them to converge in the same direction in respect to choices and social affairs - serve the people (aka help each other, cooperate etc), or compete and fight.

Polarity as such is an extremely simple principle which repeats everywhere in existence, but creates infinite refractions due to the fact that polarities of everything interact.

So then, if we go with the battery analogy, there must always be a net charge of zero.

Translating this back into the metaphysical aspect, it would imply that entities desiring to polarize in one direction are inextricably dependent upon those desiring to polarize in the opposite direction. So ultimately, each serves the other whether or not they are aware or willing to acknowledge it.

Hmm. Yet... Our Logos has a clear bias toward the positive polarity. How would we account for the net zero polarity?