(02-12-2019, 01:04 PM)IndigoGeminiWolf Wrote:(02-12-2019, 12:28 PM)unity100 Wrote:(02-11-2019, 07:36 PM)IndigoGeminiWolf Wrote: I think being cruelly honest with someone is a misuse of blue ray. We can be too honest.
No, it isnt. That's the nature of blue. Its sharp. So much that in the material it is mentioned that there comes a point in which the entity is expected to radiate itself regardless of reactions from others.
Blue has to be blue when it is time to manifest blue. It needs to be honest at all times. And never lie out of compassion or 'politeness'.
Only with 6th, when green is re-introduced to the blue, the sharpness of the blue is softened, without changing its nature. Love doesnt bring lies or dishonesty or make them acceptable. The positive entity remains honest.
Except through 6th, the entity learns how to introduce or practice the truth smoothly, without invading or imposing.
Especially in angloamerican societies, there is a cultural trait that presents a measure of dishonesty, or 'white lies' or even 'slight modifications' to truth as 'politeness', 'being compassionate', or even 'being caring'. Its even apparent in the manner of speaking in which these matters are discussed - check out what you are saying "We can be too honest". Which means that one should not be 'too honest', which implies that there is a limit to honesty after which lies can be told. Whereas in reality honesty is honesty - its either there, or it isnt.
That's a bad practice. A lie is a lie. It doesnt matter whether the lie is a 'white lie' told to a 5 year old, or a very roundabout, almost contradicting 're-wording' of truth to an ignorant person who insists that the earth is flat. A lie is a lie regardless of the intention. And it will have its metaphysical effects.
One may choose not to tell the truth and therefore choose not to say anything, defer telling the truth to a future point in time, state that doesnt want to talk about it, even allow existing misconceptions on the other person's part to continue without speaking the truth to that person, speak the truth in an understandable and easy to digest, but not over-imposing way, or may choose any of the many potential courses of action.
But truth must be told to the degree it is known, if it is going to be told. The most disturbing, irritating, half-arsed truth is better than the most comforting lie in the long run.
My mom's dog wandered off about a year ago. It disappeared and is presumed dead. He was old.
A police officer noticed him and posted about him on a site.
My mom was pissed off that the officer didn't tie her dog up and call her.
She threatened that she would shoot the officer in the head if she had a gun.
When I was leaving for an appointment, I noticed her dog down the street the day he wandered off, but didn't think much about it.
If I told her I saw him, she would throw a fit. It wouldn't help bring the dog back, and would produce stress on her.
I think this is blue ray mixed with green ray.
I am not telling her because she threatened to shoot an officer because he didn't tie her dog up.
What would she do with me, living with me? She insults me a lot already.
What would be the benefit of telling her I saw her dog?
There would be NO benefit - and extreme risk
I've already read many posts how abusive your mother can be to you; so you're simply being completely sensible, honourable (to yourself - to protect yourself) (to her - to protect her from the outcome of any violence to you)
I very much dislike how your mother has treated you for many years of posts of yours that I've read.
Not telling her is an action of self love/self protection/self worth and silent 'rebellion'...
It's a healthy response and I really like it.
She's so toxic she would be furious (without validity) - get upset and feel a (useless) pain. Then take it all out on you.
Your protection of yourself is understandable and logical.
Aaaaand - SHE has set up the very conditions (her behaviour) that mean you feel too apprehensive to tell her - so that's ON HER.
She uses and abuses you.
Plus - what the hell is with wanting to shoot someone? WTF !?
did the dog have a collar with ph number?
even if yes - maybe the officer couldn't risk a bite or was in the middle of a call - and lost sight of him as he moved on past... maybe s/he called a catcher (with equipment) but was not found... s/he wrote a notice up....
ffs.
has your mother got a diagnosis?