(01-23-2019, 11:14 AM)IndigoGeminiWolf Wrote: I would love to be able to ask him his view on Infinity. I think that would be more fundamental than even consciousness.
Infinity and consciousness are synonymous from my perspective.
If there was an infinity that was not conscious, what would be there to register its existence?
It might as well not exist in that circumstance. Consciousness 'validates' existence. It is *being*. "I think, therefore I AM." In fact, it is existence itself.
Without the watchingness, there is no watched, and there is no watcher. Both the watcher and watched arise out of 'watchingness'. The 'watchingness' is the thing between the perceiver and the perceived. Both the perceiver and the perceived are created or arise by introducing the illusion or distortion of separation. It is like moving two magnetic poles away from each other (they want to pull back together or 'reunify'). The 'watchingness' starts to believe it is a watcher -- a person or specific identity, and believing in that illusion naturally, and reflexively, validates and vivifies the other illusion (the illusion of 'perceived', the illusion of 'matter' -- the south magnetic pole to the north magnetic polaris of Self).
This is part of the fundamental and cosmic projection of the energy centers/kundalini system.