12-21-2010, 11:28 PM
With regard to the concept of toying with both the STO and STS polarities i think the following excerpt is interesting
http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is..._0313.aspx
The above would suggest that thoughts are just thoughts and are unpolarized, so think what you will, no harm done. The reference to "360 degrees of possibility" is usually code for consideration of both STO and STS concepts. Moving into the realm of actions such as speech; they can be unpolarized, STO, or STS depending on whether you are just saying what you think, helping but respectful of free will, or actively trying to infringe.
Attempting to do away with polarity by adopting a "sixth-density understanding of total unity" whilst living in 3rd density (whilst a noble a sentiment) is apparently ill advised.
The last bit however would suggest thoughts or "the way you think" are important since obviously they influence your actions. So i guess its a bit of a redundant argument to say you can think what you like and no harm done, but that of course depends on what you consider harm. Is switching over from STO to STS inclinations 'harm done'...both paths are valid. I suppose in the end its just a shame you've lost what otherwise would have been good company.
http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is..._0313.aspx
Quote:And it is at this level, at the level of choice of polarity, that the ones known as Ra were speaking when they said that all things are acceptable in the realm of thought and action as long as they do not infringe upon another. Clearly, at this moment, the one known as Ra was speaking of how to serve others and how to increase positive polarity. The one known as Ra, just as the one known as Hatonn, and the one known as Latwii, those who make up the principle of Q’uo, are those who come to this circle of seeking as representatives of the positive polarity. It is the positive polarity that we attempt to share through our conversations with you. And when dealing with positive polarity, the very first rule is the rule of free will. Called a law or a way, free will is primal. Your rights as a spiritual entity as well as a physical entity under the Law of One, positive polarity, end at the tip of your nose, the end of your fingers and your teeth.
In other words, it does not infringe upon others to think what you will. To say that which you think is an unpolarized act unless it comes under the discipline of service to others. Thusly, the one known as Ra was attempting to say that it is part of the exploration of who you are to think thoughts of 360 degrees of possibility. But to engage others without their request in such unpolarized thoughts is not consonant with the Law of One, [in its] service-to-others polarity.
If one attempts to live within the sixth-density understanding of total unity in a polarized, three-dimensional and third-density illusion such as you experience, there will be profound confusion. There will be an interruption in the smooth progression of your polarity. Within third density your lessons have to do with how to magnify the light by the way you think and by the way you live. Then, clearly, if others have not requested your opinion or your action, and you press your words or your actions upon them regardless, you are no longer respecting their free will. You are no longer seeing them as equal to yourself. Rather, you have diminished them. You have ceased respecting them.
The above would suggest that thoughts are just thoughts and are unpolarized, so think what you will, no harm done. The reference to "360 degrees of possibility" is usually code for consideration of both STO and STS concepts. Moving into the realm of actions such as speech; they can be unpolarized, STO, or STS depending on whether you are just saying what you think, helping but respectful of free will, or actively trying to infringe.
Attempting to do away with polarity by adopting a "sixth-density understanding of total unity" whilst living in 3rd density (whilst a noble a sentiment) is apparently ill advised.
The last bit however would suggest thoughts or "the way you think" are important since obviously they influence your actions. So i guess its a bit of a redundant argument to say you can think what you like and no harm done, but that of course depends on what you consider harm. Is switching over from STO to STS inclinations 'harm done'...both paths are valid. I suppose in the end its just a shame you've lost what otherwise would have been good company.