Third density life origin

[Bring4th_Austin]

I wouldn't ever try to dissuade anyone from interpreting inconsistencies that they find on their own terms. I think for anyone who gives at least some credence to more conventional historical narratives widely accepted by science (which I do), there are conflicts with this in the Ra material. Because I care about the material and my personal identity has a bit of a stake in it, I recognize that my mind will tend to try to explain things away so that they give room for Ra's words to hold primacy over other traditional narratives. I've come to work with this as sort of a self-aware cognitive dissonance. I think it's good for anyone sorting through conventional knowledge vs. Ra's words to keep in mind.

That said, my mind works out the inconsistency of Ra's claims of when humans first existed and the conventional history with a similar sentiment others here have shared: that the types of behaviors exhibited by humans from 75,000-500,000 years ago were not necessarily indicative of 3rd density consciousness. I would challenge this notion:

No 2D entity would bury his dead, that is clearly the mark of 3D consciousness and spiritual behavior. Same for art, with earliest evidence of aesthetic expression around 100,000 years ago.

I'm not quite sure why these things would have to be exclusive to a fully 3D being. I think it is completely within the realm of possibility that these are glimmers of 3D consciousness shining through higher 2D beings. There are animals today that use tools and show faint glimmers of abstract thought, even abstract communication. The very basic behaviors of burial (an incredibly deep-rooted ritual that must have some sort of instinctual origin) and the basic artistic renditions from 100,000 years ago, in my mind, could very well be the confluence of an impending 3rd density, higher second-density life, and instinct meeting with the first signs of abstract thought. I wouldn't even discount that humans of 500,000 years ago could reach the most basic types of behavior indicative of 3D abstract thought.

I see it similar to 3D beings having the ability to grasp and express love. This obviously isn't a 1 to 1 comparison, but we aren't blind to love just because we aren't in 4D. We are able to understand love, even if just a small amount. Surely there are behaviors of humans now (or even thousands of years ago) that can be compared to 4D behaviors. But similarly to how there's a vast chasm between simple cave drawings and the interconnected society of 2018, there is probably a chasm between our idea of love and the actual love of 4D.