12-16-2010, 10:21 PM
Quote:I agree that those are concepts -> definitions -> finite, but I don't think that means they aren't applicable. The whole is infinity, and the not-whole is finiteness. My body is composed of virtually innumberable parts, but the conglomeration of them all as a whole is one body, and this is a primal paradox of the relationship of the many to the One.
however even the concept of 'applicability' is something within infinity subset. so i think :
Quote:IMhO, if there is any single truth it is that infinity is undefinable.
that is the one surefire thing.
Quote:If entities only return to Intelligent Infinity, then where is the transition point between one octave and the next? My point is that there isn't one because such a transition would require the finite concepts of time and space.
an octave, a manifestation of the central sun that exists in a creation, i see, as a focus that manifests from infinite intelligence. the sea of infinite intelligence, finds a focus point, and there manifests a central sun.
when all again merge at the sun, and octave ends, all return to the sea again.
as far as i see, sea contains aspects of space, and time in itself. the distribution of these, their focusing, probably is the thing creating creations. ie - a form of separation.
Quote:I believe, and I could be totally wrong, that the point "between" the highest level of 7th density and 8th/1st of the next octave is where Infinity "resides". In that sense you are right in that there can't be any entities in a state of infinite nothingness.
i dont think so. for, in between infinity and any kind of octave/density, there resides infinite intelligence.
we are given no information or pointer to infinite intelligence returning to infinity. we are told that, all coalesce in the one central sun again, and then after a timeless state (perfectly balanced infinitely chaotic/orderly zen sea of infinite intelligence), another creation begins when a new focus is found.
Quote:I know, based on your posts on this forum thus far, that you've studied the Law of One material in great detail, so I'm wondering why you would say that they are same and equivalent. One is embedded in the other, but I don't think that makes them same and equivalent, even though they both have the same source (infinity). A rough anology might be the baby in the womb. It is its mother in that it's attached and fully dependant on her, but it is also a separate being.
http://lawofone.info/results.php?session...c=1&ss=1#7
here
Quote:Ra: I am Ra. Awareness led to the focus of infinity into infinite energy. You have called this by various vibrational sound complexes, the most common to your ears being “Logos” or “Love.” The Creator is the focusing of infinity as an aware or conscious principle called by us as closely as we can create understanding/learning in your language, intelligent infinity.