Contact with Intelligent Infinity

[Cobrien]

Dissecting light fragments to the code of function that the wave performs is a way to reach intelligent infinity. Think of a pyramid dividing the visible spectrum of all colors from one ray of white light. Each ray that comes from the sun is its own entity which sends its own code and function on what to do when it interacts with matter. The intelligent infinity can be traced through these "light ray entities" and can be broken down into binary code for their purpose.

Sometimes it's easier to simple say something is profound rather than offer muddied and unclear discourse.

It was perfectly clear to me in fact I know the number representing the frequency of light I embody(binary code in colins word) and have for several years.
I greatly enjoyed hearing someone else say it so I think this is a case of some posts are intended for some and not necessarily going to be useful to all.

Well now that's a polite jab at the end. Try offering such an explanation to a scientist. 'New age' pseudo-science is prolific and unchallenged, case in point.

I have little interest in this forum. Admittly, I fell into the New Age jargon and concepts. Flismy explanations don't cut it for me anymore.

Spirituality/new age is rightly criticized for being unchallenged and fluffy, but I think the scientist perspective doesn't appreciate that cognition turns on language and grammar, and for new or rare studied concepts, a new type of language is needed. 

For example, you can't really explain complicated mathematical concepts with the alphabet - you need the numerical system. On the other hand, you can't really explain a Shakespearean play using numbers, because the numerical system was not designed to describe emotions (barring using a mapping of the numerical system to the alphabet, but that's still relying on the alphabet at its core).

You kind of see this issue when our language tries to describe thoroughly studied concepts which are closer to spirituality: How do you do describe romantic love to someone who has never experienced it? And romantic love is a commonly contemplated subject over our history. This issue becomes magnified when you start talking about concepts that are seldom widely considered from a historical perspective, such as unity or oneness, so some problems in explanation in these areas is to be expected.

The problem with your analogy is alphabetic symbols are used in math with rigorous and concise meaning. Language is a reference to communicate. Common meaning is necessary to be understood in a reliable way.

Colinrobertson is word-bating, saying something he barely understands in a tangled and confused way. 

If you can't really explain something, why bother to? Obviously, you can only explain/know what you have attained. In Kabbalah, this is demonstrated by how you utilize the langauge of roots and branches. There's no point talking, in this respect. (Atzmuto)