06-26-2018, 05:14 PM
(06-26-2018, 01:04 AM)Agua Wrote:(06-25-2018, 12:33 PM)JJCarsonian Wrote: Q1) When Ra and Seth talks about the "Self" are they talking about the "Logos".. Is the Logos considered our soul in totality? Or is the "Self" considered the Creator?
Ra and Seth, as well as most spiritual literature, refer to the "real Self" as opposed to the illusory self.
It is often indicated through the use of a capital "S".
It refers to your "individuality core", that which you are at your deepest core, beyond all illusion.
In hinduism and yogic scriptures it is called "atman" which is the individualized divine Self as opposed to "brahman" which is the divine itself or oneness, just in case you are familiar with that.
What might me confusing for you is that your line of investigation is based on a "wrong" assumption:
You base it all on the idea of time.
Time does not exist outside the illusion, it is being developed (and then stuck to) INSIDE the illusion.
Existence is timeless, absolutely timeless. It's true simultaneity.
It is our "way" of perceiving things in a "sequential order" which makes things appear happening one aft the other.
You could compare to a book. You hold the book in your hands, all pages and words are there simultaneously, but you read it piece by piece.
Hi Agua
Thank you for your response.
I do understand that all time exists simultaneously. I also understand that the Self exists in past, present, and future lives up and down the densities. I get the sense, though, that there is a continuous creation of timelines, a continuous creation of experiences. In short, all time is simultaneous, but not all experiences are simultaneous, and i think creation in this octave is continuously expanding and changing. There is a constant branching out of the soul to continue evolving.
So i think my main question, is what do Ra and Seth consider the "Self"? Its not the Logos (although we are sub sub logos)? Is there only 1 "Self", or are there many selves? I guess at the highest level, there really is only 1 self, but im trying to get an understand what Ra and Seth are referring to as the Self.