Meeting yourself in this life

[Glow]

P

Do you know why this is problematic? Firstly it says nothing about such a concept in the LOO material. Secondly, it abridges free will. And thirdly, who knows?

You have to really give this a little thought considering free will. For example.

By your analogy, a couple mind/body's living parallely of the same spirit complex at the same time right? Meaning they become one after death right?

Well what does that even mean to personal development in a veiled 3rd density?

How can one gain polarity and progress towards the creator in their own way? I.E.

What if one part achieves 95% STS? (Are all parts automatically harvested STS because the spirit is one?)

What if only a few parts achieve STO harvest? (Do all parts get harvested STO?)

What if one part is manipulated and sent to a different time/space and born in a negative space/time environment by the higher self? (Do all parts go there because in time/space it's one entity?

It just abridges free will, and has a LOT of space for manipulation.

Re-read Q'uo answer when asked parallel incarnations, the answer is so blurred and in-definitive as if it's talking to the oneness of all and not two parallel selves.

I have to go to work. I cannot really reply appropriately right now.

First I have already addressed the freewill earlier in conversation with you. Second the returning to one energy blob isn’t about everyone’s total energy but my frequentcy. I am not Glow. I inhabit Glow. Well big I does and the sum of what makes little i is contained within the whole of big I. I’m not talking harvest or being returned to the one.

Sometimes I forget to spell out every facet of what I’m saying but I have been shown repeatedly my own and the parallel going back into the one energy only to be called out again separated. Just because particules join doesn’t meant they can’t be called out again.

I have a huge day and have to go so cannot address everything but I wonder why you read a thread titled meeting yourself in this life if it bothers you much? You have free will not to.

Should I avoid discussing my experience on a thread clearly titled?
I’m not sure what you want me to do. Would you like this topic banned?
Or would you rather I just don’t share freely? I have avoided it for you several times on other threads for you but it doesn’t make much sense here on the one clearly titled.

If you have all these arguments about why it’s not real or right then that’s cool go with that. You don’t have to believe me, and I already said it doesn’t apply to most so just pick one of the 2 it isn’t something you believe or it doesn’t apply to most. Nothing to get to terribly upset about we all don’t have to agree.

Ok running late.

It's a discussion which holds potential for manipulation if seen or interpreted in certain ways, that is why I take interest in it.

You shouldn't avoid or hold yourself from discussing your experiences.

And it's a good thing that we can all share our views and opinions that are opposing, that's how we grow in understanding each other's guts.

I'm not saying that it is not real, but rather interpreted in a such a distorted way that it abridges free will and has a lot of space for fear based manipulation. (Most likely unintentional) That's what I'm trying to convey. When one is sharing certain understandings about knowing beyond about an other-self outside of their own self, do you understand what I mean?

How do you see what I wrote as fear based and manipulative?
I’m not in a state of fear so I’m not seeing how I could be pushing fear.