06-01-2018, 06:14 PM
(05-31-2018, 05:23 PM)yossarian Wrote: 5.1//For example, they strongly reject the idea of 75,000 year major cycles. I partially agree with them: without evidence or rational basis for the 75,000 year claim, the reader can't make use of the claim and can't consider it true knowledge.
Actually there could be an explanation for these cycles. In astronomy it's called axial precession.
Quote:At another page on their site they say you should recognize a true teacher by their fruits which should be things such as compassion, service, honesty, stability, ethics, etc. Again, by their own standards, L/L Research shines more brightly than their own occult-mysteries.org site does.
I agree. They (the occult group) have a lot of mirror sites with slightly different look and titles. And all the secrecy about further information ... This smells of manipulation and money-making.