STS Orion Crusader here, Polarizatunity.

[Sacred Fool]

Responding to what I did read in this thread:

---How is the Negative path more difficult than the positive path? According to Ra---
1. Negative entity uses only top 3 chakras (+ root chakra?); Positive entity uses all 7 chakras!
2. Negative entity must polarize 95% to get out of 3d; Positive entity only needs 51% to graduate! Simple math so far!
3. Negative entity must suffocate heart chakra, the source of love! Ra tells us all things are light and that light is love! Therefor, to take the negative path you must travel without access to something essential!
4. Negative entity must become increasingly disciplined to monitor and control the energy that he manipulates, he must work increasingly for his advancement. Positive entity DANCES, increasingly rewarded THROUGH THE NATURE OF THE WORK, advancing toward the very source, instead of away from it!

---You are a 6th density STS Wander? Unlikely! According to Ra---
It is a stretch to say that there is such thing as a 6th density STS entity. How can an entity practice separation an know that all is one? Advancement on the negative path means less need for use of other selves- less need for domination. Why would an advanced negative soul risk the hazard of forgetting, and depolarization, to incarnate here?  ...The negative path requires that you hold finity and duality as truth; you reject the Law of One painfully if you are negative and my understanding of Ra is true.

Thank you.

Fair enough....but.......     Consider this.  If one realizes, as a 3d being, that it has explored higher realms, both positive and negative, this opens up many more pathways of exploration than if one simply identifies as positive.  Although I an not advocating self-centered exploration, I am suggesting that there is a lot more out there to explore than the regulation sto pathways of service.  Or, put another way, pathways of service may include more than Ra's simple service to those laboring in sorrow.  One is limitied only by the scope of one's imagination, no?