(03-29-2018, 09:25 PM)johncarson698 Wrote:(03-28-2018, 10:36 PM)DynamicBri Wrote: So the Nazca lines are a bit of a mystery but I thought I'd present the little evidence available. I forgot to mention, the Nasca depictions are cartoony looking animals that are congruent with the artistic expression of the Nasca people. I'm quivering right now Orion. Complete state of awe.
But golly, the archeology done on the heads is quite extensive. When I say, "the evidence is overwhelming" I am not referring to just the carbon-dating, the carbon dating is only part of the picture. Given the nature of the comments, I've concluded that my emphasis on the carbon-dating was misleading.
Where and how the heads were made is well documented. We also have found two ways in which a primitive culture can move such large structures as well. There are large pathways in which the structures are moved, broken heads, incomplete heads, tools, you name it. One could say that Orion intentionally manifested these things but how far is one willing to stretch it? The logical inference is that the heads are made by humans.
i do agree 60k sounds a little far fetched. i think Ra may have misplaced a 0 like he does quite often. 6k sounds more reasonable lol.
Anyways, i honestly would take archaeologists findings with a grain of salt, and you really dont know if they are talking about things done by copy catters or orion. Also, they are often times not very accurate. Their whole history is screwed up, i think we can all agree with that. I just dont think its worth thinking.
I don't think Ra made a '0' mistake here. He clearly states that Nazca Lines and Easter Islands statues were made during what he calls the first major cycle, which was between 75,000 and 50,000 years ago according to him.