Ra on the Easter Island Heads and Nazca Lines

[JJCarsonian]

Ra says that the heads of Easter Island are made with the power of thought to invoke a sense of power influence (such as a governing force) and awe in the viewer. But there is overwhelming evidence suggesting that these heads are created by humans.

Ra says that the heads of Easter Island are 60,000 years old but carbon dating suggests they are created from 1100 to 1620 AD.
Source of carbon-dating: https://books.google.ca/books?id=blsknwE...&q&f=false

Ra says that the Nazca Lines were at least 60,000 years ago. Archeology suggests that they are created by the Nazca people. Wooden stakes were found at the end of some of the lines and were carbon dated to 525 AD. These stakes were remnants of land surveying tools used by the Nazca people. Furthermore, the Nasca lines are shallow lines created by moving a top layer of small rocks.  As of 2012, the lines are said to have been deteriorating because of an influx of squatters inhabiting the lands. How in the world would the lines be 60,000 years old?
Source of carbon-dating: https://books.google.ca/books?id=1V-BIdl...on&f=false

(The relevant Ra transcripts start at 20.30 and end near the end of the session.)

Okay, let me make a couple points:

1) You can't carbon date stone (Easter Island Heads), stone isn't made of Carbon. They carbon date other items lying around it, which has a high probability to be completely wrong.
2) Ra states the Nazca lines are just remnants of something that use to be there. We don't know what use to be there. The terrain use to be completely different, too.
3) Ra is very poor with judging timelines, he states this many times. he could very well be wrong
4) Ra also stated that there were some copy catters that came in after the fact, trying to mimick what they saw

5) I dont quite believe Ra's timeline, either, but you should realize by now that archeologists are really stupid and closed minded. They think they are using science, but then they turn around and disregard solid evidence. They use the evidence they want to paint the story they want. Once that story solidifies, they have a really hard time being open to other concepts. They are like kids trying to figure out how skyscrapers are built. On top of this, there is so much political BS in the way of the truth, that they will shut down anyone else who has a different opinion. We all know Pyramids are not burial chambers. We all know the Sphinx is way older than they say - but Egyptologists marvel in their own culture, such that God forbid that they find out the pyramids and sphinx were built by a different culture.