Text attacking Law of One and Ra Material

[Cannon]

I've found another one. Attacking also other channelings. What do you think?

From what I've read, they didn't provide any arguments for the Ra Material being wrong or untrustworthy aside from the claim that positive teachings through the channeling technique are far less likely than negative ones, that 'good' mediumship is essentially impossible, and in their minds that settled the whole thing. And that it should settle the matter for you as well. They provided no new ideas, or even seemed to have put any honest effort in examining the Material itself to find any particular aspects to find fault with aside from a cursory reading. They also personally insulted Carla and the others in a way I found genuinely disgusting, even moreso considering Don's dramatic suicide due to the whole thing which is spoken of at the end of the work, which I doubt they were even aware of. They would have if they finished reading it. They were very arrogant throughout the entire conversation, to say the least.

They also seem to foolishly think that if a source has some entry level information in it, or even mentions well known ideas, then it is safe to assume that entry level information is all that it contains and disregard it entirely. They did so in the interview, at least, scoffing when the Material introduced the idea of the Law of One. There is also apparent in their conversation a sort of dogmatic preference for what they consider 'ancient wisdom', traditional sources, as if the ideas of the past were always right, that ancient sages were simply infallible, or that true teachings could never corrupted throughout history. For anyone who takes the Ra Material seriously to any degree they provided nothing intellectual to change one's mind. They gave no arguments to consider, no new facts, no new ideas, only the obnoxious bullying associated with a blocked yellow ray center/solar plexus Chakra that should be set aside in favor of the humility required for unconditional love. They themselves were of confused (and ineffectual) positive polarity at best, and I see no reason to look into anything else they have ever or will ever produce.