02-16-2018, 05:24 AM
Dat center ball, pictured in the previous messages, is probably Proxima Centauri b, or the planet and its associated power production, short details:
[Disclaimer; "Hi Vir.
" ]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri_b
Proxima Centauri b is in the habitable zone, (that it is, you all know the little dresses in black boy)
Hazardous physical conditions. (later high school in kindergarten.)
The exoplanet is close enough to its host star that it might be tidally locked. (No, very very close to it)
Temperatures might be suitable for liquid water to exist. (True, uses shower and water facilities, though sparingly)
Orbital eccentricity could result in synchronous rotation, with one hot side permanently facing towards the star, while the opposite side is in permanent darkness and freezing cold. (Has a distinct middle of the night light and dark blotches on dayside area, calling these cities)
A resonance similar to that of Mercury, where Proxima b would rotate around its axis approximately every 7.5 Earth days with about 22.4 Earth days elapsing between one sunrise and the next. (Get a distinct sense of biting on flesh softly when looking at b and if turning to bite hard get distinct sense of boob in mouth, which is almost always associated with a sentient civilization trying to turn you, I'm ready to call sentient, rest is rambling)
Environment would result;
Assuming an atmospheric N2 pressure of 1 bar and ∼0.01 bar of CO2, in a world including oceans with average temperatures similar to those on Earth, a wide equatorial belt (non-synchronous rotation), or the majority of the sunlit side (synchronous rotation), would be permanently ice-free.
A large portion of the planet may be habitable if it has an atmosphere thick enough to transfer heat to the side facing away from the star.
If it has an atmosphere, simulations suggest that the planet could have lost about as much as the amount of water that Earth has due to the early irradiation in the first 100–200 million years after the planet's formation.
Liquid water may be present only in the sunniest regions of the planet's surface in pools either in an area in the hemisphere of the planet facing the star or—if the planet is in a 3:2 resonance rotation—diurnally in the equatorial belt.
All in all, astrophysicists consider the ability of Proxima Centauri b to retain water from its formation as the most crucial point in evaluating the planet's present habitability.
The planet may be within reach of telescopes and techniques that could reveal more about its composition and atmosphere, if it has any.
Current efforts directed at 90g the one with the burning hot city/volcano mix on its surface.
Current power usage less than needed to confirm life, not desirous of doing an atmospheric test, or, phonecall, so we'll continue to slowly sneak up hospital electrical and piping grids until we land in the middle of the hospital PC's, assuming civilization uses lamps and concentration of heat in "outchie" mode when scanned is either lamp or lamp like computers, meaning that we have a positive lock on the type of circuit board they want us to draw for the first tier contact.
Dat ouchie causes one or both eyes to roll back in head randomly due to "will be up too much" and then causes sedation, somewhat apparent but not so much so as fisheye mode which makes the person watching curious which eye the person is watching through, this because planet(with life on it thats not earth) is as a concept larger than any before, causing the much acclaimed @÷فس فاث سثىسث خب ثغثسهلاف ىخف فاث سثىسث خب سةثمم هىرثقسثسثو خق فاث سهةهمشقمغ نىخصىو فثمثنهىثسهسو حقخلامثةز@ "Its the eyesight not smelling, in inverse, or similarly much known, telekinesis, problem."
My apologies if translator is off.
The mixing of the fuel at Proxima Centauri's core through convection and its relatively low energy-production rate mean that it will be a main-sequence star for another four trillion years, or nearly 300 times the current age of the universe.
It has a radial velocity toward the Sun of 22.2 km/s.
Among the known stars, Proxima Centauri has been the closest star to the Sun for about 32,000 years and will be so for about another 25,000 years, after which Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B will alternate approximately every 79.91 years as the closest star to the Sun.
Proxima Centauri is beyond belief small, Gamma Centauri which is sometimes confused (with[1])is massive and somewhat more undesirable, while Alpha and Beta Centauri are massive by comparison so their tidal effect replacing Proxima could spell the end of our civilization, that being said, Proxima Centauri could be moved fairly easily.
"In short, in 25.000 years our closest star that has been the closest one for 32.000 years will be replaced due, 2 giant stars which will take 80 year intervals in being the closest star.
The small closest star probably has life on it and seems to, to my estimate, feel that such a replacement would result in a harsher form of life on earth as the norm."
Long story short, I have two questions:
1, Should we direct from others focus into this star, pictures is its planet in the ball of light.
2, Should we recall the older memebers?
Here is picture of water being split into different electrons for your joy:
![[Image: PwBsy9G.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/PwBsy9G.jpg)
[Disclaimer; "Hi Vir.
" ]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri_b
Proxima Centauri b is in the habitable zone, (that it is, you all know the little dresses in black boy)
Hazardous physical conditions. (later high school in kindergarten.)
The exoplanet is close enough to its host star that it might be tidally locked. (No, very very close to it)
Temperatures might be suitable for liquid water to exist. (True, uses shower and water facilities, though sparingly)
Orbital eccentricity could result in synchronous rotation, with one hot side permanently facing towards the star, while the opposite side is in permanent darkness and freezing cold. (Has a distinct middle of the night light and dark blotches on dayside area, calling these cities)
A resonance similar to that of Mercury, where Proxima b would rotate around its axis approximately every 7.5 Earth days with about 22.4 Earth days elapsing between one sunrise and the next. (Get a distinct sense of biting on flesh softly when looking at b and if turning to bite hard get distinct sense of boob in mouth, which is almost always associated with a sentient civilization trying to turn you, I'm ready to call sentient, rest is rambling)
Environment would result;
Assuming an atmospheric N2 pressure of 1 bar and ∼0.01 bar of CO2, in a world including oceans with average temperatures similar to those on Earth, a wide equatorial belt (non-synchronous rotation), or the majority of the sunlit side (synchronous rotation), would be permanently ice-free.
A large portion of the planet may be habitable if it has an atmosphere thick enough to transfer heat to the side facing away from the star.
If it has an atmosphere, simulations suggest that the planet could have lost about as much as the amount of water that Earth has due to the early irradiation in the first 100–200 million years after the planet's formation.
Liquid water may be present only in the sunniest regions of the planet's surface in pools either in an area in the hemisphere of the planet facing the star or—if the planet is in a 3:2 resonance rotation—diurnally in the equatorial belt.
All in all, astrophysicists consider the ability of Proxima Centauri b to retain water from its formation as the most crucial point in evaluating the planet's present habitability.
The planet may be within reach of telescopes and techniques that could reveal more about its composition and atmosphere, if it has any.
Current efforts directed at 90g the one with the burning hot city/volcano mix on its surface.
Current power usage less than needed to confirm life, not desirous of doing an atmospheric test, or, phonecall, so we'll continue to slowly sneak up hospital electrical and piping grids until we land in the middle of the hospital PC's, assuming civilization uses lamps and concentration of heat in "outchie" mode when scanned is either lamp or lamp like computers, meaning that we have a positive lock on the type of circuit board they want us to draw for the first tier contact.
Dat ouchie causes one or both eyes to roll back in head randomly due to "will be up too much" and then causes sedation, somewhat apparent but not so much so as fisheye mode which makes the person watching curious which eye the person is watching through, this because planet(with life on it thats not earth) is as a concept larger than any before, causing the much acclaimed @÷فس فاث سثىسث خب ثغثسهلاف ىخف فاث سثىسث خب سةثمم هىرثقسثسثو خق فاث سهةهمشقمغ نىخصىو فثمثنهىثسهسو حقخلامثةز@ "Its the eyesight not smelling, in inverse, or similarly much known, telekinesis, problem."
My apologies if translator is off.
The mixing of the fuel at Proxima Centauri's core through convection and its relatively low energy-production rate mean that it will be a main-sequence star for another four trillion years, or nearly 300 times the current age of the universe.
It has a radial velocity toward the Sun of 22.2 km/s.
Among the known stars, Proxima Centauri has been the closest star to the Sun for about 32,000 years and will be so for about another 25,000 years, after which Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B will alternate approximately every 79.91 years as the closest star to the Sun.
Proxima Centauri is beyond belief small, Gamma Centauri which is sometimes confused (with[1])is massive and somewhat more undesirable, while Alpha and Beta Centauri are massive by comparison so their tidal effect replacing Proxima could spell the end of our civilization, that being said, Proxima Centauri could be moved fairly easily.
"In short, in 25.000 years our closest star that has been the closest one for 32.000 years will be replaced due, 2 giant stars which will take 80 year intervals in being the closest star.
The small closest star probably has life on it and seems to, to my estimate, feel that such a replacement would result in a harsher form of life on earth as the norm."
Long story short, I have two questions:
1, Should we direct from others focus into this star, pictures is its planet in the ball of light.
2, Should we recall the older memebers?
Here is picture of water being split into different electrons for your joy: