02-05-2018, 02:49 PM
I think your misunderstanding of me is thinking I'm trying to say the One has it's own viewpoint. I'm not saying that, what I'm saying is I don't know the ONE, no one does seemingly in this octave, so it seems a bit egotistical to believe you're the one if you ask me.
And if you think my taking into account the ego means I'm somehow 'separating' creator from self, then all I can say is I don't seperate the ego, I accept it's existence and even try to respect it by not separating it just because it was programmed to create the perspective of separation.
The ego is the Creator too.
But I can't say anything is the One Creator or Source of Itself because as far as we know, the One Creator is a mystery, an origin story. We don't even know if the One is One or if it's something more or different or abstract, we're all belonging to it and it belongs to us, but there is a distinction. Without that there wouldn't be you or me, just One.
And if you think my taking into account the ego means I'm somehow 'separating' creator from self, then all I can say is I don't seperate the ego, I accept it's existence and even try to respect it by not separating it just because it was programmed to create the perspective of separation.
The ego is the Creator too.
But I can't say anything is the One Creator or Source of Itself because as far as we know, the One Creator is a mystery, an origin story. We don't even know if the One is One or if it's something more or different or abstract, we're all belonging to it and it belongs to us, but there is a distinction. Without that there wouldn't be you or me, just One.