Service vs Disservice

[rva_jeremy]

"Service To" is by definition benevolent the opposite of that would be disservice against.

Isn't that a matter of perspective, though, on the part of the one providing the service, receiving the service, or observing the service?

The problem here is that we seem to want to put each event in a single bucket: an act is either STS or STO. But this defeats the purpose of polarity, which is not to be able to categorize each activity we encounter but instead to throw our own nature into relief. The question is not whether something is a service or a disservice so much as how your reaction to it reveals something about yourself that you couldn't otherwise notice.

So we don't need to put to rapist or pedophile in a STS or STO bucket; we need only reflect on how they make us feel, and try to either (A) accept that feeling or (B) reject and control it. I believe STS and STO are really energy dynamics at their core, and the behaviors we attribute to them are just coarse, clumsy indicators that frequently misfire because we want to be lazy about reflecting on the energetics in a truly open manner.

In higher densities, it seems that STO polarized entities do depolarize in order to resist STS incursion. Similarly, I imagine STS collectives assist each other even when it depolarizes them. The pure separation between the polarities is not designed to be some ultimate state of reality, in my opinion. It is designed to allow us to better appreciate and ideate upon our status as the Creator. How will we use these pure energy dynamics not to become pure ourselves so much as to understand our inherent purity outside of the lens of polarity? That is the mystery I think we're exploring in this thread.