12-04-2010, 10:16 PM
(12-03-2010, 05:45 AM)Ali Quadir Wrote:Quote:the thing you are missing is, this current now is the product of the past that is behind us.PastS...
Sorry unity, you're still not getting it.
Quote:'now' is the product of 'past'. for past to change, now should also change, at this very instant.pastS.
Seriously, you're thinking linearly and deterministically, and because this new idea doesn't fit your linear model you discard it.
While the linear model has been discarded by science for a while now.
the possibility of pasts, exist. actually the existence of potential pasts, is a given, since there are different timelines branching out of any point.
but.
the question here is, whether a focus point which has been following a certain timeline, can change BACK its timeline.
basically, the product of a certain timeline, the significator of an entity (as it can be in time/space, or whatever reality it occupies) is basically the result of that timeline. ALL things that took part in that timeline, became that entity's past, is basically contained in that entity.
changing that entity's past would not only mean changing that entity entirely, but it would also mean changing of the 'now' it currently occupies. so, then the entity would totally be an entity that had followed a DIFFERENT timeline, and became the product of that timeline.
basically, that entity in the initial state, is no more. and because the other entity that was in the timeline that totally been switched to, was already there (because such a timeline existed in infinity), that means, there has been no change there.
there was entity A as formed by timeline A, there was its B version formed by timeline B.
you totally changed entity A into what it would be if it followed timeline B. that entity, is entirely now the entity B. its continuum is the point at the continuum in timeline B. entity a is no more. entity B never changed, so, a change in timeline never occurred in regard to past.
IF timeline A comes and ends and merges with timeline B, then, that would STILL not make a change of past -> it would be that at timeline B there is a point where timelines A and B converge and merge to one single timeline at B.
.............
practically, all the information we have in channelings etc, regarding timelines, talk about FUTURE timelines. neither in Ra, nor in quo, there is anything regarding to changing of past timelines.
Quote:You're just guessing now. Cayce did not remember living with his clients.
Also if people decide to remember someone else's past, or their soul group, then their own other possibilities are definitely an option.
cayce lived in atlantis himself at one point. actually, he probably lived with his clients at points in time.
however, that is irrelevant - cayce got his info from akhashic records, by contacting infinite intelligence and accessing 7d energies in this planet's future totality. from this point, he accessed entities' pasts, and made predictions for potential futures, judging from the probability vortices that were present at that time. this is what we get if we merge what Ra has said about cayce and what cayce tells.
so, basically, cayce told the entities' pasts to them, and potential future.
Quote:Also your initial position was:
Quote:what they did in the past, puts them in the position they are today. if there is any clearing/balancing specific to their own past, they would be best suited to do it, due to their past, violet balance, and the dynamics in that universe.You've now shifted this to soul groups.
i dont know why you are saying that. i didnt shift anything to anything.