11-29-2017, 08:54 PM
Yeah, well, it's pitiful how sometimes a person can fall 4ft from the ground while putting up Christmas lights and that's the end of their life.
Like, I struggle greatly, despite my usual rants, believing that less than 15% of humanity will be harvested.
So this guy, an uncle, father, seemingly decent human being who did the best he could, isn't going to be accepted as loving enough to make it into 4D? It's just hard to imagine that the human identity would be used as such a measuring tool to depict if one is worthy enough to provide further love. It is quite a twisted lens, I think any light at all should make one elegible, but more, any sustained amount should make one harvestable. Just one time where they were sustained at providing service to others. I might b**** about my mom a lot but underneath all of her actions I selfishly judge, I think she should be harvested because I think her soul has done the best it could with what it had, and if that isn't good enough then I don't think anything ever will be, and I think the entire idea is a bit bogus then when love can judge love and hold it back from loving the way it wants to love.
Pity, it is pitiful indeed how our love/light can also be so twisted despite not being human. As if to say, humanity has something to give souls, as much as they have to give us. A sense of... Morality, a much more profound understanding of mercy. I think, if even one soul manages to make one sustained service of providing love, it should be considered for harvest, with the only judgments being for their safety.
Is it that pitiful? For a man to die so...pointlessly? Is it pitiful to feel Less Than?
You know Gemini. You've put up with a lot too and you've managed somehow, to try and try and try to love, you don't seem to stay down. So, perhaps it is pitiful that you've become smaller, or maybe its that you've learned to concentrate yourself on things that matter and now you're looking back at how big and everywhere you were, and seeing how much smaller and focused you are now, you think that's bad.
I think it's maybe good in a way.
You know. It's like before you used to be really focused on anthros, then that led you into a path that has inevitably brought you here and now, to where you're putting so much effort into improving what you've accomplished, and more, expanding upon that. Developing yourself.
It doesn't seem pitiful in that light then, that your psychic abilities were not the final destination for your life path.
It's just I feel like Earth has managed somehow, and that means there's a lot more good people here than we might judge from a glance at our world. It means there's more love shining than darkness consuming. That we're not destroying ourselves but persisting, there must be a lot of good people to make that possible.
I think, most of them should be considered for being harvested. I think the limit should be if its too much for them to exist in 4D light, but I don't feel like 50% all sto actions as a single human life is the measurement for that. I feel like that's judging the entirety of the soul by the very limiting and restricting human life it led, a life possibly designed to be so intense with disruptions of love that the few chances it shone through were squashed by surrounding circumstances, how does those few chances not qualify the soul?
It's a bit sad to think so many good people might not be allowed an afterlife of love that they'd go through this hell for, all because they were willing and loving to have a chance to help this place be better.
So, I like to think Earth circa2020 is much different from Earth circa1980, because in those 40 years Earth and its people have changed.
The real questions in my opinion belongs to the supervisors of Earth, the so-called Councils and Guardians. And of all 3D really. To put well-meaning entities through a gauntlet to have them prove themselves. This is not of an unconditionally loving creation in my mind, rather it is of a distortion of that creation, and I do not know why the illusion is allowed to be culled in the light that emerges within it just because the darkness was given initial control.
It's like playing chess but the bright side has no pawns.
It's rigged.
What does that say about the overseers of 3D? This is the idea behind difficulty? Make loving souls go through gauntlets of darkness and separation?
The seperation has been decently explained in its mechanism, doesn't seem innately dark in anyway. But the gauntlet of darkness. Now that's different. Catalyst used as a control mechanism to either cull or germinate the expression of love/light depending on the human ego's consciously informed reaction to it.
Then to make it most noticeable in a dark light, in a place where darkness governs.
Just sounds so... Unloving.
Sometimes things just seem amiss to me, like there's something devious, a lie, perhaps, hmm...
Like, I struggle greatly, despite my usual rants, believing that less than 15% of humanity will be harvested.
So this guy, an uncle, father, seemingly decent human being who did the best he could, isn't going to be accepted as loving enough to make it into 4D? It's just hard to imagine that the human identity would be used as such a measuring tool to depict if one is worthy enough to provide further love. It is quite a twisted lens, I think any light at all should make one elegible, but more, any sustained amount should make one harvestable. Just one time where they were sustained at providing service to others. I might b**** about my mom a lot but underneath all of her actions I selfishly judge, I think she should be harvested because I think her soul has done the best it could with what it had, and if that isn't good enough then I don't think anything ever will be, and I think the entire idea is a bit bogus then when love can judge love and hold it back from loving the way it wants to love.
Pity, it is pitiful indeed how our love/light can also be so twisted despite not being human. As if to say, humanity has something to give souls, as much as they have to give us. A sense of... Morality, a much more profound understanding of mercy. I think, if even one soul manages to make one sustained service of providing love, it should be considered for harvest, with the only judgments being for their safety.
Is it that pitiful? For a man to die so...pointlessly? Is it pitiful to feel Less Than?
You know Gemini. You've put up with a lot too and you've managed somehow, to try and try and try to love, you don't seem to stay down. So, perhaps it is pitiful that you've become smaller, or maybe its that you've learned to concentrate yourself on things that matter and now you're looking back at how big and everywhere you were, and seeing how much smaller and focused you are now, you think that's bad.
I think it's maybe good in a way.
You know. It's like before you used to be really focused on anthros, then that led you into a path that has inevitably brought you here and now, to where you're putting so much effort into improving what you've accomplished, and more, expanding upon that. Developing yourself.
It doesn't seem pitiful in that light then, that your psychic abilities were not the final destination for your life path.
It's just I feel like Earth has managed somehow, and that means there's a lot more good people here than we might judge from a glance at our world. It means there's more love shining than darkness consuming. That we're not destroying ourselves but persisting, there must be a lot of good people to make that possible.
I think, most of them should be considered for being harvested. I think the limit should be if its too much for them to exist in 4D light, but I don't feel like 50% all sto actions as a single human life is the measurement for that. I feel like that's judging the entirety of the soul by the very limiting and restricting human life it led, a life possibly designed to be so intense with disruptions of love that the few chances it shone through were squashed by surrounding circumstances, how does those few chances not qualify the soul?
It's a bit sad to think so many good people might not be allowed an afterlife of love that they'd go through this hell for, all because they were willing and loving to have a chance to help this place be better.
So, I like to think Earth circa2020 is much different from Earth circa1980, because in those 40 years Earth and its people have changed.
The real questions in my opinion belongs to the supervisors of Earth, the so-called Councils and Guardians. And of all 3D really. To put well-meaning entities through a gauntlet to have them prove themselves. This is not of an unconditionally loving creation in my mind, rather it is of a distortion of that creation, and I do not know why the illusion is allowed to be culled in the light that emerges within it just because the darkness was given initial control.
It's like playing chess but the bright side has no pawns.
It's rigged.
What does that say about the overseers of 3D? This is the idea behind difficulty? Make loving souls go through gauntlets of darkness and separation?
The seperation has been decently explained in its mechanism, doesn't seem innately dark in anyway. But the gauntlet of darkness. Now that's different. Catalyst used as a control mechanism to either cull or germinate the expression of love/light depending on the human ego's consciously informed reaction to it.
Then to make it most noticeable in a dark light, in a place where darkness governs.
Just sounds so... Unloving.
Sometimes things just seem amiss to me, like there's something devious, a lie, perhaps, hmm...