Worry/Hope

[YinYang]

I think worry implies a lack of trust, and also a lack of acceptance. We were actually chatting about this yesterday afternoon. If we go from the supposition that you are a wanderer who came here, then you knew exactly what kind of a situation you were coming into, and you knew exactly what the evolutionary level of earthlings are. The biggest disservice you can do this place, is constantly thinking and commenting on what is wrong with it, thereby rejecting it. It's not trusting the evolutionary mechanisms that were put in place, and the game playing itself out. It's not understanding creation and destruction, while knowing that there is no loss.

Ra: It is to be kept in the forefront of the faculties of intelligence that there is one creation in which there is no loss.

Ra: This is why we iterate quite often, when asked for specific information, that it pales to insignificance, just as the grass withers and dies while the love and the light of the One Infinite Creator redounds to the very infinite realms of creation forever and ever, creating and creating itself in perpetuity.

Why then be concerned with the grass that blooms, withers and dies in its season only to grow once again due to the infinite love and light of the One Creator? This is the message we bring. Each entity is only superficially that which blooms and dies. In the deeper sense there is no end to beingness.

I am reminded of an argument between Alan Watts and Margaret Mead.

I once had a terrible argument with Margaret Mead. She was holding forth one evening on the absolute horror of the atomic bomb, and how everybody should spring into action and abolish it, but she was getting so furious about it that I said to her: "You scare me because I think you are the kind of person who will push the button in order to get rid of the other people who were going to push it first."

So she told me that I had no love for my future generations, that I had no responsibility for my children, and that I was a phony swami who believed in retreating from facts. But I maintained my position. As Robert Oppenheimer said a short while before he died, "It is perfectly obvious that the whole world is going to hell. The only possible chance that it might not is that we do not attempt to prevent it from doing so." You see, many of the troubles going on in the world right now are being supervised by people with very good intentions whose attempts are to keep things in order, to clean things up, to forbid this, and to prevent that. The more we try to put everything to rights, the more we make fantastic messes. Maybe that is the way it has got to be. Maybe I should not say anything at all about the folly of trying to put things to right but simply, on the principle of Blake, let the fool persist in his folly so that he will become wise.

He was trying to teach her something in that moment, something which is at the cornerstone of his teaching - acceptance and letting go - but she didn't get it.

I agree with Elros that worry has an element of control in it, and it is the opposite of letting go, of acceptance. The freedom lies in surrendering and letting go. Let the world be, let the evolution happen. The design is perfect. You were also once at a very primitive evolutionary level compared to where you are now, but you were allowed to evolve, allow them the same. Let each creator, each sub-logos, create to their heart's content, taste the fruit of their creations, and learn from it.

Ra: I am Ra. Your opinion is an eloquent one although somewhat confused in its connections between the freedom expressed by subjective knowing and the freedom expressed by subjective acceptance. There is a significant distinction between the two.

This is not a dimension of knowing, even subjectively, due to the lack of overview of cosmic and other inpourings which affect each and every situation which produces catalyst. The subjective acceptance of that which is at the moment and the finding of love within that moment is the greater freedom.

That known as the subjective knowing without proof is, in some degree, a poor friend for there will be anomalies no matter how much information is garnered due to the distortions which form third density.