08-15-2017, 01:07 AM
Seems to me like this person was rejecting the concepts before he/she actually got a grip of them. It's easy to attack the material based on reading people's interpretations. A lot of his preconceptions about certain concepts seems increadibly distorted to me.
This person speaks of many sources, which in any case invalidate the very concept of a source. If there is a source, there can only be one source, else it is not the source yet. Just like his understanding of the illusion seems to be based on someone else's very limited understanding of it. There is an almost black and white difference between seeing the world as something that is not how it appears to be and seeing the world as non existant.
This person also seems to reject the concept of releasing the ego but clearly that person has not yet found the limits of one's ego. Nowhere in the material does it say that we should be almost empty shells with no souls walking around.
The part about letting nasty entities abuse others seems also based on interpretations of someone else because clearly Ra never stated such a thing. There is an abyss of perception between working on one's own perceptions of unity and letting someone else abuse you.
I can surely understand his/her fears of harvest, but to me the point of harvest is exactly about releasing any forms of judgment towards the self and other self, rather than weighting the soul on every action, which kind of end up having the opposite effect and leads one to fear the harvest. His understanding of the harvest seems based on the idea that the harvest is an event occuring where everything changes suddenly. I do not believe the universe works that way. The universe always operates in a subtle way, like the flow of a river, constant and seamless. If you see the harvest as something ever happening, like the present moment, then there is no fear that this is just some entitie's plan to feed on your soul but rather just a step in your own process.
This person speaks of many sources, which in any case invalidate the very concept of a source. If there is a source, there can only be one source, else it is not the source yet. Just like his understanding of the illusion seems to be based on someone else's very limited understanding of it. There is an almost black and white difference between seeing the world as something that is not how it appears to be and seeing the world as non existant.
This person also seems to reject the concept of releasing the ego but clearly that person has not yet found the limits of one's ego. Nowhere in the material does it say that we should be almost empty shells with no souls walking around.
The part about letting nasty entities abuse others seems also based on interpretations of someone else because clearly Ra never stated such a thing. There is an abyss of perception between working on one's own perceptions of unity and letting someone else abuse you.
I can surely understand his/her fears of harvest, but to me the point of harvest is exactly about releasing any forms of judgment towards the self and other self, rather than weighting the soul on every action, which kind of end up having the opposite effect and leads one to fear the harvest. His understanding of the harvest seems based on the idea that the harvest is an event occuring where everything changes suddenly. I do not believe the universe works that way. The universe always operates in a subtle way, like the flow of a river, constant and seamless. If you see the harvest as something ever happening, like the present moment, then there is no fear that this is just some entitie's plan to feed on your soul but rather just a step in your own process.