08-14-2017, 04:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-14-2017, 10:38 PM by Steppingfeet.)
This person has lots of interesting, albeit from my standpoint debatable, insight into the nature/purpose/meaning/direction of existence and evolution. He or she has clearly contemplated the mystery.
But this seeker seems also to want to speak with authority and objectivity on the subject: Things are this way; things are not that way. Etc.
He or she makes declarative statements based upon what they believe the Law of One is communicating, which may have distortions relative to what Ra intended to communicate.
Fortunately or not, we live in a universe of plurality where the perspective are as diverse as the entities, and where no one entity or group, Ra included, has the final say on what is/is not truth. (I say all objectively n stuff.)
Though certainly there is a spectrum of more distortion, and less. And we should try to share/compare/contrast our perspectives to help refine our individual understandings.
I got a chuckle out of IU's "my god is bigger than your god."
But this seeker seems also to want to speak with authority and objectivity on the subject: Things are this way; things are not that way. Etc.
He or she makes declarative statements based upon what they believe the Law of One is communicating, which may have distortions relative to what Ra intended to communicate.
Fortunately or not, we live in a universe of plurality where the perspective are as diverse as the entities, and where no one entity or group, Ra included, has the final say on what is/is not truth. (I say all objectively n stuff.)
Though certainly there is a spectrum of more distortion, and less. And we should try to share/compare/contrast our perspectives to help refine our individual understandings.
I got a chuckle out of IU's "my god is bigger than your god."
Explanation by the tongue makes most things clear, but love unexplained is clearer. - Rumi