This Logos is an individualized portion of intelligent infinity

[unity100]

Why do you indentify the sun as this individualized logos? Could it not be that the whole solar system is part of this manifestation as Ra seems to say in your quote?

ra doesnt seem to say that in that quote. but more importantly :

http://lawofone.info/results.php?session...c=1&ss=1#1

29.1 Questioner: Is our sun a sub-Logos or the physical manifestation of a sub-Logos?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

Sun is a manifestation of a sub logos.
....
(insert any number of potential sub logoi here that goes above to the central sun in order)
....
a central galactic sun is a manifestation of a sub logos.

which is in turn a sub logos of any sub logoi that is potentially in between it, and the central sun of this universe, which is in turn, a sub logos of the other sub logoi potentially in between it, and the central sun that created all these universes.

.........

your proposition goes to lump all the existing things in this solar system as sub logos (which is the sun here). this is wrong, because then we would just have to lump all the existing things in this galaxy as a sub logos themselves, and this would go all the way up to the initial central sun of all existence. then there would have no meaning to the concept 'sub logos'.

but there is ; as Ra tells us, anything that creates is a sub logos, and is a sub logos of a logos, that is in turn the sub logos of other sub logoi.

It shall be understood that any portion, no matter how small, of any density or illusory pattern contains, as in an holographic picture, the One Creator which is infinity. Thus all begins and ends in mystery.

Also note this remark, it's extremely important... It must mean that it still contains the original thought even if it's the nth derivate. The part actually and paradoxically contains the whole. This includes you and me.

again this.

'containing a blueprint' does not mean that you can contain the infinite.

because, then there would be no way that you could be finite, and therefore experience freedom, love, or any kind of thing that only been able to come to being with the invention of finity.

'a picture of' does not mean 'itself'.

..........

in case you meant to say that they only contain the pattern of original thought, this would possibly indeed be true.

however, reverting back to that state of original thought would align the finite into the first finite concept that was discovered, and cause the entity to cease to exist as an entity, ending its freedoms, emotions, existence, because it would return to infinite intelligence and only be as free as the infinite intelligence is.