07-11-2017, 06:24 PM
(07-11-2017, 03:25 PM)YinYang Wrote: I don't agree with you on this, Diana. Don asked a very simple and straight-forward question, and Ra gave a very simple and straight-forward answer. Naturally any vegan won't love the answer Ra gave, but alas, there it is, in black and white. I agree that the Ra material shouldn't be taken as gospel, but you can't take something that straight-forward and say "people interpret it erroneously", simply because it contradicts the vegan point of view.
I'm sorry, I don't really want to open a can of worms again on the meat eating business... but this just bugs me. I'm happy with someone saying "I'm vegan because of compassionate reasons", and I feel the same as you, I also lost my appetite for red meat after watching factory farming videos, but I won't attempt to "reinterpret" Ra's words to complement my own sentiments on the matter. It's a personal thing for me, for which I don't require external validation.
The above bolded is not what I'm doing.
I'm not trying to justify some agenda I have. I also need no validation. Neither do I have a need to make anyone agree with me.
Please refrain from pointing fingers at someone you obviously know nothing about, and blaming them for words and intentions they don't have.
Judgmental statements like the above make me want to leave this forum, as many before me have done for similar reasons.
Not to mention I think you are wrong. But that's another conversation, and one that was canvassed extensively already. I think it goes without saying, at least if any logic is applied, that channeled material must be influenced by the channel. And the concerns and motives of Ra, may not always be as straightforward as you seem to think.