05-04-2017, 08:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-04-2017, 08:47 AM by APeacefulWarrior.)
"Reading comprehension" does NOT entail "imagining things the person did not say." He specifically referred to the holocaust as a fake story with zero evidence, and that's all he said. If he didn't want to be perceived as a holocaust denier then he could have done as you did and provided more information about his beliefs. He did not, so I responded to what he said. Not guesses at what he didn't say.
But either way, if you really want to get pissy that I didn't use your preferred terminology... Fine, whatever. Have fun. The rapidity with which you jumped down my throat makes it appear that you're just itching for an argument, and I'm not nearly interested enough to provide it.
Cheers.
But either way, if you really want to get pissy that I didn't use your preferred terminology... Fine, whatever. Have fun. The rapidity with which you jumped down my throat makes it appear that you're just itching for an argument, and I'm not nearly interested enough to provide it.
Cheers.