(05-03-2017, 10:26 PM)gestir Wrote: It's just that Ra states so clearly that some (spirits) where "destroyed" and that it would be "the loss to the Creator" and at the same time you're saying that nothing is destroyed and that nothing is lost. Would you please explain to me in a different manner so that I may understand? If something is not destroyed, then why is it said "those who where destroyed.."? And if there is no loss to the creator, then why is it said that it would be a "loss to the Creator"?
A bit like anagogy said just above, it relates to the Logos. The spirit would be loss from within our Logos and would re-form alongside another one as still a harvest of all past Octaves but also as a harvest of its initial growth within this Octave it repeats as part of another Creation. You could say it would be lost from our shared-reality but not lost from the Source itself.
I relate it to the loss of a mind complex as it also is a loss of something the Creator is in death, to me there is little differentiation in face that the spectrum of comparison is infinite. Just as the confederation attempts at aiding the beingness across the Octave of others to survive, humans do attempt to save other humans from death just as they may feel despair at the loss of loved ones. Is it truly all that unimportant? or is it natural to empathize with what is alike your beingness being lost when it is the object of your love?