Hmmmm. I suppose I see it a little differently. The way I see it is that the unpotentiated intelligent infinity isn't quite subjective. It is the Self, yet not in the sense of having a "Self". It is consciousness without perception. Am-ness as anagogy put it. I see the feeling of "I" as coming with the limitation of the viewpoint. Perhaps as coming with the potentiation of infinity.
It's as if we have our little ego, and the Logos is the Divine Ego. The source of the Logos would be that unpotentiated intelligent infinity. Pure divinity beyond objectivity, and perhaps even subjectivity. Consciousness without subject or object.
I believe this very subject is the cause of much contrast between Hinduism and Buddhism. Hinduism emphasizes the Supreme Self, which is selfless. Yet Buddhism emphasizes the lack of a Self.
All opposites are reconciled in unity
It's as if we have our little ego, and the Logos is the Divine Ego. The source of the Logos would be that unpotentiated intelligent infinity. Pure divinity beyond objectivity, and perhaps even subjectivity. Consciousness without subject or object.
I believe this very subject is the cause of much contrast between Hinduism and Buddhism. Hinduism emphasizes the Supreme Self, which is selfless. Yet Buddhism emphasizes the lack of a Self.
All opposites are reconciled in unity