04-18-2017, 01:45 PM
Hey Gemini Wolf, there isn't a lot of information of what experiences are possible within 6th density (at least Ra didn't speak much about them). For that reason I think some comparability/contrast might be useful, which is why I have compiled a couple of Seth's quotes here. I think most on bring4th who have studied Seth agree that Seth is probably from 5th density. Here are a couple of quotes, and if it can be assumed that Seth is 5D, then it can give a deeper insight as to what might be beyond his own experiences.
Also talking about higher levels here:
This multiple present description reminds me of what Ra has said:
Back to Seth.
6D is a whole different dimension from 5D (assuming that Seth is from 5D), so what 6D entities can do must be very mind blowing and incomprehensible to humans. Even in these communications Seth said he was not fully focused in his "native environment" and even if he was, he could not truly explain his experiences because they would not be understood (or would not be able to be translated into physical terms). With this said, it could be said that 6D is hyper-abstract, but there are still many limitations.
Quote:I am aware of a different kind of experience, not linear, and can focus upon and react to an infinite variety of simultaneous events. Ruburt could not express them, and so they must be leveled out into linear expression if they are to be communicated.
Quote:Consciousness always creates form, and not the other way around. So my environment is a reality of existence created by myself and others like me, and it represents the manifestation of our development.
We do not use permanent structures. There is not a city or a town, for example, in which I dwell. I do not mean to imply that we are off in empty space. For one thing we do not think of space as you do, and we form whatever particular images we want to surround us.
They are created by our mental patterns, just as your own physical reality is created in perfect replica of your inner desires and thoughts.
Quote:In my home environment I assume whatever shape I please, and it may vary, and does, with the nature of my thoughts.
- - Having long ago recognized the dependence of form upon consciousness, we have simply been able to change our forms entirely so that they more faithfully follow each nuance of our inner experience.
- - Now, we can also take several forms at one time, so to speak, but you can also do this although you do not generally realize it.
Quote:We do not exist in any time framework as you know it. Minutes, hours, or years have lost both their meaning and their fascination. We are quite aware of the time situations within other systems, however, and we must take them into account in our communications.
Quote:I told you that we do not experience your time sequence. We travel through various intensities. Our work, development, and experience all takes place within what I term the 'moment point.' Here, within the moment point, the smallest thought is brought to fruition, the slightest possibility explored, the probabilities thoroughly examined, the least or the most forceful feeling entertained. It is difficult to explain this clearly, and yet the moment point is the framework within which we have our psychological experience. Within it, simultaneous actions follow "freely" through associative patterns. For example, pretend that I think of you, Joseph. In so doing I immediately experience - and fully - your past, present, and future (in your terms), and all of those strong or determining emotions and motivations that have ruled you. I can travel through those experiences with you, if I choose. We can follow a consciousness through all of its forms, for example, and in your terms, within the flicker of an eye.
Quote:We can form from ourselves, from our own psychological entireties, other personalities whenever we wish. These, however, must then develop according to their own merit, using the creative abilities inherent in them.
Quote:There is no four o'clock in the afternoon or nine o'clock in the evening in my environment. By this I mean that I am not restricted to a time sequence. There is nothing preventing me from experiencing such sequences if I choose. We experience time, or what you would call its equivalent nature, in terms of intensities of experience - a psychological time with its own peaks and valleys.
This is somewhat similar to your own emotional feelings when time seems speeded up or slowed down, but it is vastly different in important ways. Our psychological time
could be compared in terms of environment to the walls of a room, but in our case the walls would be constantly changing in color, size, height, depth and width.
Our psychological structures are different, practically speaking, in that we consciously utilize a multidimensional psychological reality that you inherently possess, but are unfamiliar with at an egotistical level. It is natural, then, that our environment would have multidimensional qualities that the physical senses would never perceive.
Quote:I communicate with your dimension, for example, not by willing myself to your level
of reality, but by imagining myself there. All of my deaths would have been adventures
had I realized what I know now. On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the
other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough.
We enjoy a sense of play that is highly spontaneous, and yet I suppose you would
call it responsible play. Certainly it is creative play. We play, for example, with the
mobility of our consciousness, seeing how "far" one can send it. We are constantly
surprised at the products of our own consciousness, of the dimensions of reality
through which we can hopscotch. It might seem that we use our consciousness idly in
such play, and yet again, the pathways we make continue to exist and can be used by
others. We leave messages to any who come by, mental signposts.
Quote:Ruburt wondered later if I dreamed. My own usual state of consciousness
is far different from yours. I do not alternate between
waking and sleeping as you do. Still, I have states of consciousness
that could be compared to your dreaming state, in that I am myself not as involved in them as I am in others. If I said to you, "I control my
dream state," you might have an idea of what I mean. Yet I do not
control my dreams — I fulfill them. What you could call my dreaming
state is involved with the levels I spoke of that exist beneath your
remembered dreams. I said earlier that there were many kinds of knowledge.
Think of them instead as states of knowledge. Perception of any of
these takes a consciousness attuned to each. In my "waking" condition,
I operate at many levels of consciousness at once, and deal
therefore with different systems of knowledge. In my "dream" condition,
or rather conditions, I form links of consciousness that combine
these various systems, creatively forming them into new versions.
"Waking" again, I become consciously aware of those activities, and
use them to add to the dimensions of my usual state, creatively
expanding my experience of reality. What I learn is transmitted automatically
to others like me, and their knowledge is transmitted to me.
Also talking about higher levels here:
Quote:Now we have been speaking in terms of fantastically swift pulses or fluctuations, so smooth and "brief" that you do not notice them. But there are also "slower," "more vast," "longer" fluctuations from your end of the scale. These affect entirely different systems of existence than any closely connected with your own.
The experience of such kinds of consciousness is highly alien to you. One such fluctuation might take several thousand of your years, for example. These several thousand years would be experienced, say, as a second of your time, with the events occurring within it perceived simply as a "present period."
Now the consciousness of such beings would also contain the consciousness of large numbers of probable selves and systems, experienced quite vividly and clearly as multiple presents. These multiple presents can be altered at any of an actual number of infinite points; infinity not existing in terms of one indefinite line, but in terms of numberless probabilities and possible combinations growing out of each act of consciousness.
Such beings, with their multiple presents, may or may not be aware of your particular system. Their multiple present may or may not include it. You may be a part of their multiple present without even being aware of it. In much more limited terms your probable realities are multiple presents. The image, for an analogy, of an eye within an eye within an eye, endlessly repeated, may be useful here.
This multiple present description reminds me of what Ra has said:
Quote:The mind/body/spirit complex totality is as the shifting sands and is in some part a collection of parallel developments of the same entity. This information is made available to the Higher Self aspect. This aspect may then use these projected probability/possibility vortices in order to better aid in what you would call future life programming.
Back to Seth.
Quote:There are pyramid gestalts of being impossible to describe, whose awareness includes knowledge and experience of what would seem to be to you a vast number of other realities. In the terms of which I am speaking for your benefit, their present might, for example, include the life and death of your planet in a moment of their "time."
Quote:There are systems in which a moment, from your standpoint, is made to endure for the life of a universe. I do not mean that a moment is simply stretched, or that time is slowed down alone, but that all the experiences possible within a moment become realities within that framework.
6D is a whole different dimension from 5D (assuming that Seth is from 5D), so what 6D entities can do must be very mind blowing and incomprehensible to humans. Even in these communications Seth said he was not fully focused in his "native environment" and even if he was, he could not truly explain his experiences because they would not be understood (or would not be able to be translated into physical terms). With this said, it could be said that 6D is hyper-abstract, but there are still many limitations.