04-15-2009, 11:47 PM
I think the sensationalism of Lowki's post has caused some of us to forget that there will always be systems created to express parts of the Creator. Whether these systems fail because they are not grounded 100% in love or because they wind down a dead-end path is something that must be explored by its designer/leader and followers of the system. On the path of each system are the lessons and catalysts to help those who resonate exactly with that system, no matter how delusional or quirky it might seem to those who believe in more mainstream concepts.
Similar to our STS brothers and sisters, the soul will ultimately realize it cannot maintain an STS path at some point and must flip polarity at a higher density. I feel the same is true for these creative belief systems. Let's not call anyone tricksters or "brainiacs" with too much intellectual investment in a flawed or limited idea. Remember that these ideas are reflections of ourselves expressed through others, even if we are not outwardly resonating them in our daily existence. The important thing to remember is that these systems exist to help people learn and to be presented with enough catalyst for each believer to find their equilibrium of the day.
Only when someone decides to move outside the box to compare their belief to another system will they have the chance to decide whether their current system is working for them. In short, who's to judge that someone needs to be 100% committed to the "Borg" model in order to see that it's ultimately not a viable belief system, and that when it was compared to something like The Law of One, the person experienced the proper chain of catalyst to become a devout LOO subscriber? See where I'm going with this?
Similar to our STS brothers and sisters, the soul will ultimately realize it cannot maintain an STS path at some point and must flip polarity at a higher density. I feel the same is true for these creative belief systems. Let's not call anyone tricksters or "brainiacs" with too much intellectual investment in a flawed or limited idea. Remember that these ideas are reflections of ourselves expressed through others, even if we are not outwardly resonating them in our daily existence. The important thing to remember is that these systems exist to help people learn and to be presented with enough catalyst for each believer to find their equilibrium of the day.
Only when someone decides to move outside the box to compare their belief to another system will they have the chance to decide whether their current system is working for them. In short, who's to judge that someone needs to be 100% committed to the "Borg" model in order to see that it's ultimately not a viable belief system, and that when it was compared to something like The Law of One, the person experienced the proper chain of catalyst to become a devout LOO subscriber? See where I'm going with this?