Is not the Universe's Logos the second distortion.
If we take your talk with anagogy from the Void/Plenum thread, where it was quoted from the Ra material that this Octave springs forth from a Plenum and not a Void, this is because it is born from the first distortion which is the Plenum, otherwise our Octave would be the whole of all things, which is what the One Original Thought is. So the Logos really is the second distortion, the whole reflected in a shard, or rather in the thought of Love. This is also why this Octave is born from past harvests of experience of the Creator of Itself.
You can evaluate any level of the hierarchy of Creation as beingness, as Spirit is the foundation of all things.
About your anthromorphic interest, it'd seem paradoxal for a Logoi to have an anthromorphic form when their role is to generate themselves into a time/space of experience. So i doubt there would be anthromorphic ones but there should be infinite of them with an investment in anthromorphic 3D beings.
I guess though the definition of anthromorphic becomes paradoxal within this context because humans are no longer any form of reference point and what you consider an anthromorphic species would in turn have their own sense of anthromorphic from which they are the reference point. So you could be a furry and be unwell you don't have scales like reptiles or be hairless like hairless species in the same fashion you are unwell to not be a furry. The form forever is illusionary in it's nature and offers the perk of the relativity of itself.
If we take your talk with anagogy from the Void/Plenum thread, where it was quoted from the Ra material that this Octave springs forth from a Plenum and not a Void, this is because it is born from the first distortion which is the Plenum, otherwise our Octave would be the whole of all things, which is what the One Original Thought is. So the Logos really is the second distortion, the whole reflected in a shard, or rather in the thought of Love. This is also why this Octave is born from past harvests of experience of the Creator of Itself.
You can evaluate any level of the hierarchy of Creation as beingness, as Spirit is the foundation of all things.
Quote:15.21 Questioner: Well, in yesterday’s material you stated “we offer the Law of One, the solving of paradoxes.” You also mentioned earlier that the first paradox, or the first distortion I meant, was the distortion of free will. Could you tell me if there’s a sequence? Is there a first, second, third, fourth distortion of the Law of One?
Ra: I am Ra. Only up to a very short point. After this point, the many-ness of distortions are equal one to another. The first distortion, free will, finds focus. This is the second distortion known to you as Logos, the Creative Principle or Love. This intelligent energy thus creates a distortion known as Light. From these three distortions come many, many hierarchies of distortions, each having its own paradoxes to be synthesized, no one being more important than another.
About your anthromorphic interest, it'd seem paradoxal for a Logoi to have an anthromorphic form when their role is to generate themselves into a time/space of experience. So i doubt there would be anthromorphic ones but there should be infinite of them with an investment in anthromorphic 3D beings.
I guess though the definition of anthromorphic becomes paradoxal within this context because humans are no longer any form of reference point and what you consider an anthromorphic species would in turn have their own sense of anthromorphic from which they are the reference point. So you could be a furry and be unwell you don't have scales like reptiles or be hairless like hairless species in the same fashion you are unwell to not be a furry. The form forever is illusionary in it's nature and offers the perk of the relativity of itself.