10-26-2010, 12:47 PM
(10-26-2010, 12:28 PM)peregrine Wrote: Intense? I suppose, but to me it also sounds wonderfully artistic...to hearken back to some of my previous comments.
How about we compromise on full and rich?
(10-26-2010, 12:32 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: Haha, I didn't think of it as a bone thrown at you.
Oh sure, now you're throwing it at me!
(10-26-2010, 12:32 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: My impression is that the arguments laid out are seeking to label one path 'good' or 'better than' the other, and one path 'wins' over the other. That is still attributing the concept of duality, to a density that no longer has duality.
Why even think in terms of 'winning?'
Not sure where you're getting that from. I haven't labeled one path better than the other or talked (or even thought) in terms of winning.