6D Wanderers: 3D Lessons?

[Monica]

Are you trying to take back that bone you threw me?

Haha, I didn't think of it as a bone thrown at you.

The point I was trying to make had to do, as peregrine aptly phrased it, with the general continuity of the path. I don't think you disagree with that, but please correct me if you do.

Well I'm not sure whether I agree or disagree, because I'm not sure exactly what you're getting at. You seem to be suggesting that there is a 'good' path that continues and a 'bad' path that ends.

In a sense, I'd say that's true, being that the path that 'is' continues while that path that 'is not' doesn't.

But I don't think it's quite as is being described (as far as I can tell) in this discussion. My impression is that the arguments laid out are seeking to label one path 'good' or 'better than' the other, and one path 'wins' over the other. That is still attributing the concept of duality, to a density that no longer has duality.

Why even think in terms of 'winning?'

To us, the STO path is certainly better. As they say, "good is better than evil because good is nicer." That is our bias.

But it seems to me that attributing such attributes to a path that is beyond our current polarized paths, is still seeing them from a perspective of separation.

I don't see one path as 'continuing' because that implies linear time, and we are talking about 6D here, which is not bound by linear time.

I would say that the path in late 6D isn't so much a continuation, but something new entirely.

I just don't think we can attribute 3D perceptions of good/bad to late 6D. Ra said negative AND positive polarity don't exist in late 6D. So I don't see how late 6D could be said to be a 'continuation' of something that no longer exists.

So in that sense, I would disagree.

Of course, this is based on my puny, limited understanding here in 3D. What do I know?