6D Wanderers: 3D Lessons?

[Monica]

Here's the point that I feel is being missed, and maybe the problem is that we lack terms for this type of discussion.

What??? You don't think we can adequately and accurately communicate, with perfect articulation and clarity, concepts related to entities millions of years more advanced than us, existing in densities we cannot even begin to imagine??

HUH?? Gosh, I don't see what the problem is!

I'm fine with saying that Ra seeks without polarity because there is no more negative path for their positivity to contrast with.

Yippppeeeeee! Glad we got past that!

But the point I've been trying to articulate is that nothing essential about Ra changed when the negatives abandoned their path.

Are you sure? How can we know that? How can we even begin to know in what ways Ra might have learned, grown, and evolved in what would be eons of time to us? We know that they continue to learn when they teach us. We know they do other things with their time too. The few years of contact with us was like the blink of an eye to them. I don't think we can even begin to speculate what spiritual evolution is like for them.

Also, since all is ONE, how could they not be affected when the negatives abandoned their path? They probably had a big love-fest, an orgy of light/love, and lit up the galaxy!

Ra was balanced and radiant before the paths merged; they are balanced and radiant still. Apparently people here are willing to call the early-sixth density Ra positive but not the late-sixth density. OK, fine, but what do we call them? They are certainly not neutral, are they? They are not offering their aid to negative groups, are they? They still have a horse in the race.

I understand your concerns. It gets back to the perennial question philosophers have been asking for centuries, about why 'God' allows suffering if 'God' is 'good.' It can be disconcerting to ponder.

But I don't think we need be concerned about Ra. Ra has told us they offer their aid to STO groups because that is their bias, presumably because that is the path they took.

As for what to call them, Love/Light works for me. :idea:

Ra has become light/love and love/light. They are becoming more and more that which they seek, which is the Creator. Aren't light/love, love/light, and the Creator if not good, then ... what? Full of joy, glory, power, and peace? Doesn't becoming light/love and love/light represent progress on the positive path rather than abandonment of it?

I would say, progress on the path, but the term positive no longer has relevance.

I'm not even sure path has application here, since it implies a linear progression.

Personally, I don't see why we would need to qualify the term Love/Light any more. It seems plenty descriptive to me.