12-03-2016, 01:50 AM
I've noticed a lot of confusion in the metaphysical community about how dimensional levels are defined, and thus labeled; in addition, some confusion exists between the terms "density" and "dimension", which may not refer to the same thing. In this light:
1) Law of One material refers to "desnities" (which may only correlate to variable and questionable degrees, with "dimensions")
2) Other metaphysical writings seemingly even use the term "dimension" in different ways. For example, some (referring to the same universe/realm) say that 12 possible dimensions are at play here, while others reference only 9. Same realm, with same intrinsic templates governing its consciousness evolution, but the "steps along the way" are defined or grouped differently. Similarly, some speak of mankind (in the harvest period) entering 5th dimension, while others mention 4th dimension.
With such semantic confusion, we each possibly need to develop a clear inner sense of what is meant by the terminology of each Source, so as to better translate the intended meanings of one Source's labels understandably into the terminology of another Source's. Sort of a liguistic translation exercise.
1) Law of One material refers to "desnities" (which may only correlate to variable and questionable degrees, with "dimensions")
2) Other metaphysical writings seemingly even use the term "dimension" in different ways. For example, some (referring to the same universe/realm) say that 12 possible dimensions are at play here, while others reference only 9. Same realm, with same intrinsic templates governing its consciousness evolution, but the "steps along the way" are defined or grouped differently. Similarly, some speak of mankind (in the harvest period) entering 5th dimension, while others mention 4th dimension.
With such semantic confusion, we each possibly need to develop a clear inner sense of what is meant by the terminology of each Source, so as to better translate the intended meanings of one Source's labels understandably into the terminology of another Source's. Sort of a liguistic translation exercise.